United States v. Kim et al

Filing 30

ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/14/2015 ORDERING 26 pending motion for partial summary judgment to enforce a judgment lien against 5533 Palmdale Way, Sacramento, California, the former residence of defendants Un Sik Kim and Doo Sun Kim. It seeks an order allowing the property to be sold and ordering the sale proceeds deposited with this court. No opposition was filed, and the court took the matter under submission without holding a hearing. The motion is GRANTING. The sale proceeds will be distributed after a determination of priorities and further order.(Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-02207-KJM-CKD v. ORDER UN SIK KIM; DOO SUN KIM, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 The United States brought this action to collect federal tax liabilities. It filed the 18 19 pending motion for partial summary judgment to enforce a judgment lien against 5533 Palmdale 20 Way, Sacramento, California, the former residence of defendants Un Sik Kim and Doo Sun Kim. 21 It seeks an order allowing the property to be sold and ordering the sale proceeds deposited with 22 this court. No opposition was filed, and the court took the matter under submission without 23 holding a hearing. The motion is granted. 24 I. 25 UNDISPUTED FACTS The United States submitted a statement of undisputed facts with its motion, as 26 required by local rule. See Statement Undisputed Facts (UMF), ECF No. 26-2. As noted, no 27 opposition was filed. The court has reviewed the government’s statement and supporting 28 documents and concludes none of the following facts is subject to genuine dispute. 1 1 In 1984, Un Sik Kim and Doo Sun Kim took ownership of 5533 Palmdale Way1 as 2 husband and wife as joint tenants. UMF no. 1. In 1994, the United States obtained a judgment in 3 this court against Un Sik Kim for an unpaid trust fund recovery penalty (the Judgment). Id. no. 5. 4 The federal tax judgment is against Un Sik Kim only, not Doo Sun Kim. Id. no. 8. The amount 5 of the penalty was $133,762.16, plus interest. Id. no. 5. In 2004, the United States recorded an 6 abstract of judgment against the property. Id. no. 6. The court renewed the judgment for an 7 additional twenty years in May 2014, and that order was recorded. Id. no. 7. Un Sik Kim has not 8 paid the federal tax liability, and as of May 31, 2015, the amount due was $507,835.72, with 9 interest continuing to accrue. Id. no. 11. 10 In addition to the United States’ interest described above, Sacramento Leasing, 11 Inc. also recorded an abstract of judgment against the property in 1991 to secure an obligation of 12 Un Sik Kim in the amount of $23,765.32. Id. no. 4. Sacramento Leasing has appeared as a 13 defendant. See Answer, ECF No. 5. Hayne Kim may also claim an unspecified interest in the 14 property and has appeared as a defendant and answered the complaint. Compl. ¶ 12, ECF No. 1; 15 Answer, ECF No. 27. 16 No one currently resides at 5533 Palmdale Way. UMF no. 9. The property has 17 been vacant and is deteriorating, and neighbors have complained of code violations. Id. no. 10. 18 II. LEGAL STANDARD 19 A court must grant a motion for summary judgment “if the movant shows that 20 there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a 21 matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). A motion for summary judgment calls for a “threshold 22 inquiry” into whether a trial is necessary at all, that is, whether “any genuine factual issues . . . 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 The property’s full address is 5533 Palmdale Way, Sacramento, California 95842, APN 228-0321-005, and is particularly described as follows: LOT 17, AS SHOWN ON THE “PLAT OF THE PALMDALE SUBDIVISION”, RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY, ON APRIL 20, 1959, IN BOOK 53 OF MAPS, MAP NO. 22. UMF at 1; Compl. ¶ 13, ECF No. 1. 2 1 properly can be resolved only by a finder of fact because they may reasonably be resolved in 2 favor of either party.” Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 250 (1986). The moving 3 party bears the initial burden of “informing the district court of the basis for its motion, and 4 identifying those portions of the [record] which it believes demonstrate the absence of a genuine 5 issue of material fact.” Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 (1986). The burden then 6 shifts to the non-moving party to “go beyond the pleadings” and “designate specific facts” in the 7 record to show a trial is necessary to resolve genuine disputes of material fact. Id. at 324 8 (quotation marks and citation omitted). 9 III. DISCUSSION 10 If a taxpayer refuses or neglects to pay taxes after a demand, a lien arises in favor 11 of the United States “upon all property and rights to property, whether real or personal.” 12 26 U.S.C. § 6321. The lien continues until the liability is satisfied or becomes “unenforceable by 13 reason of lapse of time.” Id. § 6322. The United States may reduce its lien to judgment and so 14 extend the life of the lien. United States v. Overman, 424 F.2d 1142, 1147 (9th Cir. 1970). 15 “Although a lien based on that judgment is subject to state-created limitations, the judgment itself 16 is not subject to limitations and is enforceable at any time.” Id. (citations omitted). A judgment 17 lien in a civil action endures for twenty years unless it is renewed for an additional twenty years. 18 28 U.S.C. § 3201(c). Here, Un Sik Kim’s tax liability was established in a previous case and 19 reduced to judgment in 1994. The United States renewed the lien in 2014. It therefore continues 20 to this day. 21 The United States brought this action under 26 U.S.C. § 7403. Compl. ¶¶ 1–2. 22 Under that section, the United States may file a civil action in federal district court to subject real 23 property to the payment of a liability. 26 U.S.C. § 7403(a). Any person who has a claim to an 24 interest in that property must be joined. Id. § 7403(b). The district court then “adjudicates all 25 matters involved therein and finally determine[s] the merits of all claims to and liens upon the 26 property.” Id. § 7403(c). If the United States establishes a claim or interest in the property, the 27 court may “decree a sale of such property, by the proper officer of the court,” and may order the 28 ///// 3 1 proceeds be distributed “according to the findings of the court in respect to the interests of the 2 parties and of the United States.” Id. 3 Here, the United States named all interested parties as defendants.2 The United 4 States established a claim to 5533 Palmdale Way by virtue of its judgment in the previous case 5 and the associated judgment lien. Under section 7403, this court has authority to decree a sale of 6 the property and distribute the proceeds. Competing third-party interests such as those of Doo 7 Sun Kim, Hayne Kim, and Sacramento Leasing do not preclude a sale. See United States v. 8 Rodgers, 461 U.S. 677, 693–94 (1983) (“[W]e must read the statute to contemplate, not merely 9 the sale of the delinquent taxpayer’s own interest, but the sale of the entire property . . . , and the 10 recognition of third-party interests through the mechanism of judicial valuation and 11 distribution.”). 12 “The provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2001 govern foreclosures of taxpayers’ property.” 13 United States v. Stonehill, 83 F.3d 1156, 1160 (9th Cir. 1996); accord, e.g., United States v. 14 Little, No. 02-5141, 2008 WL 2676808, at *1 (E.D. Cal. June 30, 2008) (citing Overman, 15 424 F.2d 1142). Section 2002 also requires specific forms of notice. See 28 U.S.C. § 2002. The 16 court has broad discretion in setting the terms and conditions of a sale. See, e.g., Little, 2008 WL 17 2676808, at *2 (citing United States v. Branch Coal Corp., 390 F.2d 7, 10 (3d Cir. 1968)). 18 In light of the parties’ shared interest in maximizing the return from a sale and the 19 property’s deteriorating condition, a judicial sale of 5533 Palmdale Way is ordered according to 20 the terms and conditions proposed by the United States, which incorporate the notice 21 requirements of section 2002 and which no party has opposed. 22 ///// 23 ///// 24 ///// 25 ///// 26 ///// 27 28 2 Several persons named in the complaint did not answer the complaint or otherwise appear. Compl. ¶¶ 5–12; see also Default, ECF No. 25. 4 1 IV. CONCLUSION 2 3 The United States’ motion is GRANTED. This order resolves ECF No. 26. The court orders as follows: 4 A. 5 Foreclosure The United States is entitled to foreclose its liens against the real property located 6 at 5533 Palmdale Way, Sacramento, California 95842. The sale proceeds will be deposited with 7 this court and the liens and claims on the property will follow the proceeds in the same manner 8 and with the same priority as such liens and claims had with respect to 5533 Palmdale Way, and 9 the priorities will be determined by a later order of this court. 10 B. 11 12 Judicial Sale The real property described below shall be sold pursuant to the court’s Judgment, 26 U.S.C. § 7403 and 28 U.S.C. §§ 2001 and 2002, and according to the terms set out below. 13 1. Identification of Property 14 1. 15 Sacramento, CA 95842, APN 228-0321-005 (the Property), in the County of Sacramento, State of 16 California, and is more particularly described as follows: 17 The real property that is the subject of this action is located at 5533 Palmdale Way, LOT 17, AS SHOWN ON THE “PLAT OF THE PALMDALE SUBDIVISION”, RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY, ON APRIL 20, 1959, IN BOOK 53 OF MAPS, MAP NO. 22. 18 19 20 2. Authorization of Sale and Terms and Conditions of Sale 21 2. 22 States Marshal for the Eastern District of California, or his or her representative or Deputy 23 (collectively, the “Marshal”), or an officer of the Internal Revenue Service Property Appraisal 24 and Liquidation Specialists (“IRS PALS”), to offer the Property for public sale and to sell the 25 Property. The United States may choose either the Marshal or an IRS PALS officer to carry out 26 the sale and to make the arrangements for any sale as set forth in this Order. References to “the 27 Marshal or the IRS PALS” below shall be read to refer to whomever is conducting the sale. 28 ///// As provided by 28 U.S.C. §§ 2001 and 2002, the court authorizes and directs the United 5 1 3. The terms and conditions of the sale are as follows: 2 (a) 3 United States; defendant Un Sik Kim, defendant Doo Sun Kim; defendant Sacramento 4 Leasing Inc.; defendant Young Kim Oh; defendant Sung Park; defendant Dae W. Pak; 5 defendant Hayne Kim; defendant Capital One Financial Corporation; and defendant 6 JPMorgan Chase Bank. 7 (b) 8 governmental regulations (including building and zoning ordinances) affecting the 9 Property, and easements and restrictions of record, if any. No warranty of any kind is The sale of the Property shall be free and clear of the interests of plaintiff, the The sale shall be subject to building lines, if established, all laws, ordinances, and 10 made regarding operation of the Property as commercial real estate. 11 (c) 12 is located; on the premises of the Property; or at any other place in accordance with the 13 provisions of 28 U.S.C. §§ 2001 and 2002. The place of the sale shall be determined in 14 the discretion of the Marshal or the IRS PALS officer. 15 (d) 16 PALS officer. 17 (e) 18 open houses at the Property for viewing by potential bidders. Un Sik Kim and Doo Sun 19 Kim shall not interfere in any way with an open house. 20 (f) 21 consecutive weeks before the sale in at least one newspaper regularly issued and of 22 general circulation in Sacramento County, California. Furthermore, at the discretion of 23 the Marshal or the IRS PALS officer, the sale may be advertised by any other means 24 deemed appropriate, expressly including placement of a listing with a broker, provided 25 that the fee for the advertisement is a flat sum and not a commission on the sale price. 26 Each notice of the sale shall contain a description of the Property and shall also contain 27 the terms and conditions of sale in this order of sale. 28 The sale shall be held at the courthouse of the county or city in which the Property The date and time for the sale are to be announced by the Marshal or the IRS The Marshal or the IRS PALS officer may, in their discretion, hold one or more One or more notice of the sale shall be published once a week for at least four ///// 6 1 (g) 2 Property. If the minimum bid price is not met or exceeded, the Marshal or the IRS PALS 3 officer may, without further permission of this court, and under the terms and conditions 4 in this Order, hold a new public sale, if necessary, and reduce the minimum bid or sell the 5 Property to the highest bidder at the sale where the minimum bid was not met. 6 (h) 7 PALS officer, at the time of the sale, a minimum of ten percent (10%) of the bid, with the 8 deposit to be made by certified or cashier’s check payable to the United States District 9 Court for the Eastern District of California. Before being permitted to bid at the sale, The Marshal or the IRS PALS officer shall set a minimum bid price for the The successful bidder shall be required to deposit with the Marshal or the IRS 10 bidders shall display to the Marshal or the IRS PALS officer proof that they are able to 11 comply with this requirement. No bids will be received from any person who has not 12 presented proof of ability to make the deposit required by this order of sale. 13 (i) 14 the IRS PALS officer within 14 days after the date the bid is accepted. Payment shall be 15 made by a certified or cashier’s check payable to the United States District Court for the 16 Eastern District of California. If the bidder fails to pay the balance of the purchase price 17 within the required time, the deposit shall be forfeited, and the funds so forfeited shall be 18 paid to the United States for application to defendant Un Sik Kim’s tax liabilities. In 19 event of such a forfeit, the property or properties for which the deposit was forfeited may 20 be again offered for sale under the terms and conditions of this Order, or the Marshal or 21 the IRS PALS officer may sell the property to the second-highest bidder, requiring 22 payment of the purchase price within 14 days of notifying the second-highest bidder. 23 (j) The United States may bid as a credit against its judgment without tender of cash. 24 (k) The sale of the Property shall be subject to confirmation by this court. The United 25 States or the Marshal or the IRS PALS officer shall file a report of sale with the court, 26 together with a proposed order of confirmation of sale, within 14 days from the date of 27 receipt of the balance of the purchase price. 28 The successful bidder shall pay the balance of the purchase price to the Marshal or ///// 7 1 (l) 2 and deliver a deed of judicial sale conveying the property to the purchaser. 3 (m) 4 that are held or asserted by all parties to this action are discharged and extinguished. 5 (n) 6 cause transfer of the Property to be reflected upon the appropriate register of title. 7 (o) 8 redemption. 9 4. On confirmation of the sale, the Marshal or the IRS PALS officer shall execute On confirmation of the sale, all interests in, liens against, or claims to, the Property On confirmation of the sale, the County Recorder for Sacramento County shall The sale is ordered pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2001, and is made without right of From the date this Order is signed until the sale is confirmed, the Marshal or the IRS 10 PALS officer is authorized to have free access to the Property and to take all actions necessary to 11 preserve the Property, including, but not limited to, retaining a locksmith or other person to 12 change or install locks or other security devices on any part of the Property. 13 5. 14 utilities, repairs, and the like that are reasonably necessary to maintain or preserve the Property 15 until the Property is sold. Such payments may be reimbursed as a cost of sale. 16 The Marshal or the IRS PALS officer may, in his or her discretion, make payments for C. Effect of Order on the Kims’ Occupation of the Property 17 6. 18 Doo Sun Kim and no further order or process from the court shall be required. 19 7. 20 Un Sik Kim and Doo Sun Kim. The termination of their possessory rights shall take effect on the 21 date 14 days after the date this Order is signed. Un Sik Kim and Doo Sun Kim are hereby 22 ordered to vacate the Property no later than the date 14 days after the date this Order is signed. 23 They shall take with them their personal property, but leave in place all improvements, buildings, 24 fixtures, and appurtenances to the Property. 25 8. 26 after the date this Order is signed, they shall be considered to be trespassers. In that event, the 27 ///// 28 ///// This Order shall constitute a special writ of execution with respect to Un Sik Kim and This Order of Sale terminates any right of possession to the Property held by defendants If Un Sik Kim or Doo Sun Kim continues to occupy the Property after the date 14 days 8 1 Marshal is authorized to take any action he or she deems appropriate to remove and evict the 2 Kims.3 3 9. 4 within 14 days of the date this Order is signed, this paragraph shall apply. If Un Sik Kim or Doo Sun Kim fails to remove any personal property from the Property 5 (a) 6 PALS officer to return to the Property for the sole purpose of removing their personal 7 property. This permission will not be unreasonably withheld. 8 (b) 9 accompanied by the Marshal or the IRS PALS officer unless the Marshal or the IRS PALS Un Sik Kim or Doo Sun Kim may request permission from the Marshal or the IRS Un Sik Kim or Doo Sun Kim shall not return to the Property without being 10 officer specifically gives permission for him or her to return unaccompanied. 11 (c) 12 fixtures, and appurtenances, remains on the Property after 28 days have elapsed from the 13 date this Order is signed, the personal property shall be deemed abandoned because it has 14 remained on land to which the Kims have had no possessory right for 14 days without 15 being removed. The Marshal or the IRS PALS officer may dispose of any such 16 abandoned property by any means they each may deem appropriate, including destruction, 17 charitable donation, or sale. 18 (d) 19 applied first to the costs of the sale. Any remaining balance shall be paid into the registry 20 of the court for further distribution as ordered by the court. 21 (e) 22 confirmed, ownership of that personal property shall also pass to the buyer of the 23 Property. 24 (f) 25 potentially dangerous (for instance, firearms, other weapons, or incendiaries), the Marshal If any of the Kims’ personal property, not including improvements, buildings, If any abandoned personal property is sold, the proceeds of the sale shall be If any abandoned personal property is left upon the Property at the time the sale is If the Marshal believes that any item of personal property on the Property is 26 27 28 3 According to the moving papers and undisputed facts, the Property is not currently occupied. See Mot. Summ. J. at 3; UMF nos. 9, 10. These conditions are imposed to cover any contingencies. 9 1 may, in his or her discretion, secure the item rather than leaving it on the Property. The 2 item may be secured in any reasonable manner, expressly including removing the item to 3 the Marshal’s office or other facility. Any such item shall be returned to the owner if: 4 (1) the owner makes a proof of ownership satisfactory to the Marshal; (2) the owner pays 5 any reasonable costs of securing the item the Marshal may have incurred; and (3) the item 6 can be returned to the owner in a manner that is safe and legal under the circumstances. If 7 no person claims ownership of an item secured by the Marshal within 30 days, the 8 Marshal may dispose of the item in any manner he or she sees fit. 9 (g) If the personal property includes live animals, the Marshal or the IRS PALS 10 officer shall take humane steps as may be reasonable for the animals to be removed from 11 the Property. Any additional costs incurred in removing the animals shall be reimbursable 12 as a cost of sale. 13 10. 14 reasonable steps necessary to preserve the Property (including all buildings, improvements, 15 fixtures and appurtenances on the Property) in its current condition including, without limitation, 16 maintaining a fire and casualty insurance policy on the Property, and ensuring that ad valorem 17 taxes on the Property are paid in a timely fashion. Un Sik Kim and Doo Sun Kim shall neither 18 commit waste against the Property nor cause or permit anyone else to do so. Un Sik Kim and 19 Doo Sun Kim shall neither do anything that tends to reduce the value or marketability of the 20 Property nor cause or permit anyone else to do so. Un Sik Kim and Doo Sun Kim shall not 21 record any instruments, publish any notice, or take any other action (such as running newspaper 22 advertisements or posting signs) that may directly or indirectly tend to adversely affect the value 23 of the Property or that may tend to deter or discourage potential bidders from participating in the 24 public auction, nor shall they cause or permit anyone else to do so. 25 11. 26 defined below), they shall deposit an amount equal to the rent payment into the registry of this 27 court. 28 ///// Until the sale of the Property is confirmed, Un Sik Kim and Doo Sun Kim shall take all If Un Sik Kim and Doo Sun Kim receive any rent payment from a Tenant (as “Tenant” is 10 1 D. Effect of Order on Occupation by Tenants 2 12. 3 who occupy the Property as of the date this Order is signed. These persons are referred to as 4 “Tenants.” 5 13. 6 court, unless the Tenants obtain a written lease agreement with the purchaser. 7 14. 8 or she complies with the following conditions: 9 Paragraphs (13) and (14) apply to any person or persons who have rented the Property and Any Tenants must vacate the Property no later than the date the sale is confirmed by the Until sale confirmation, the Tenants may continue to occupy the Property, but only if he (a) The Tenant must truthfully answer the Marshal, an officer of the Internal Revenue 10 Service, or an officer of the U.S. Department of Justice if the Tenant is asked how much 11 rent the Tenant pays, how long the rental period is (for example, weekly or monthly), and 12 when the rent is due. 13 (b) 14 rent as follows. The Tenant must mail a check or money order payable to “United States 15 District Court for the Eastern District of CA” to the following address: 16 Instead of paying rent to Un Sik Kim and Doo Sun Kim, the Tenant must pay the IRS PALS Officer Hallie Lipscomb, IRS, SA-5209 4330 Watt Avenue, Sacramento, CA 95821. 17 18 For the convenience of the court and the IRS, the Tenant should write the following in the 19 memo line of the check: “5533 Palmdale Way.” 20 (c) 21 the Tenant would have paid the Kims. For example, if the Tenant would have paid the 22 Kims $400 on the first day of the month, the Tenant must pay the IRS $400 on the first 23 day of the month. The rent payment will be considered timely if it is mailed by the day it 24 is due. 25 (d) 26 connection with the sale of the Property. 27 (e) 28 anyone else to do so. The Tenant must not do anything that tends to reduce the value or The Tenant must continue to pay the same amount in rent and on the same date as The Tenant must cooperate with the Marshal or the IRS PALS officer in The Tenant must not commit waste against the Property, nor cause or permit 11 1 marketability of the Property nor cause or permit anyone else to do so. The Tenant must 2 not record any instruments, publish any notice, or take any other action (such as running 3 newspaper advertisements or posting signs) that may directly or indirectly tend to 4 adversely affect the value of the Property or that may tend to deter or discourage potential 5 bidders from participating in the public auction, nor cause or permit anyone else to do so. 6 15. 7 terms set out in paragraph (14), the United States may file a motion in this court requesting the 8 removal or ejectment of the Tenant. 9 16. If a Tenant continues to occupy the Property but fails to comply with one or more of the Within 7 days of the date that this Order is signed, the Marshal or the IRS PALS officer 10 or, in the discretion of the United States, another person hired for the task, shall serve a copy of 11 this Order upon each person, other than Un Sik Kim and Doo Sun Kim, who appears to occupy 12 the Property. Each served copy of this Order shall be accompanied by a cover sheet that states, in 13 prominent type: “To the Occupant: please take notice that paragraphs (13), (14) and (15) of this 14 Order may apply to you. They may affect your rights.” Service shall be accomplished by 15 delivering the cover sheet and the copy of this Order to a person of suitable age and discretion 16 who is at the apparently occupied space on the Property. In the alternative, if no such person is 17 available when a delivery attempt is made, the cover sheet and the Order may be affixed to a front 18 door; placed in a mail slot; or pushed under a front door, as the person making service judges 19 most likely to give notice to the person occupying the Property. 20 17. 21 authorized to have access to the Property as necessary to carry out the service. Un Sik Kim and 22 Doo Sun Kim shall not attempt to stop as a trespasser the person serving copies of the Order; 23 remove or deface any posted copy of the Order; or take any other action that tends to interfere 24 with the service of this Order. 25 18. 26 any person who is not already a Tenant to occupy the Property. 27 ///// 28 ///// The person who makes the service of this Order as described in the previous paragraph is After the date that this Order is signed, Un Sik Kim and Doo Sun Kim shall not permit 12 1 2 3 4 E. 19. Distribution of Proceeds The sale proceeds will be distributed after a determination of priorities and further order. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 14, 2015. 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 13

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?