Sheehan Genetics, et al v. Jakov P. Dulcich and Sons, LLC
Filing
46
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/7/16: This action remains stayed. The parties are ordered to continue the filing of a status report every sixty days to inform the court of any updates in the interference proceeding. (Kaminski, H)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SHEEHAN GENETICS, LLC, et
al.,
No. 2:14-cv-02227-KJM-DB
ORDER
Plaintiffs,
v.
JAKOV P. DULCICH AND
SONS, LLC et al.,
Defendants.
1
2
On September 3, 2015, the court stayed this action pending the resolution
3
of interference proceedings before the United States Patent and Trademark Office
4
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). ECF No. 37. The court also directed
5
the parties to file a status report every sixty (60) days, apprising the court of the
6
status of the interference proceedings. Id. The parties’ latest joint status report,
7
filed on August 24, 2016, informs the court that a decision was issued in the
8
interference proceeding on August 17, 2016. ECF No. 45 at 2. Following the
9
PTAB’s ruling, plaintiff now requests the court to lift the stay on this action. Id.
10
Defendants Jakov P. Dulcich and Sons, LLC, Jakov P. Dulcich, Nick P.
11
Dulcich, and Peter Dulcich argue in the joint status report that the interference
12
proceeding is still pending, in that no judgment has been entered on priority.
13
The PTAB’s order states that defendants are authorized to file a separate
14
motion on the patentability of plaintiff’s claim after the priority motion. ECF
15
No. 45-2 at 2. Furthermore, the judgment on priority has not been entered
16
against defendant. ECF No. 45-1 at 19. Accordingly, this action remains
1
1
stayed. The parties are ordered to continue the filing of a status report every six-
2
ty days to inform the court of any updates in the interference proceeding.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: September 7, 2016
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?