Stiles v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al
Filing
144
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 7/19/2018 EXTENDING Time to and including 8/10/2018, for Defendants to Respond to 142 Fourth Amended Complaint. (York, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
BRYAN A. MERRYMAN (SBN 134357)
bmerryman@whitecase.com
CATHERINE S. SIMONSEN (SBN 307325)
catherine.simonsen@whitecase.com
WHITE & CASE LLP
555 S. Flower Street, Suite 2700
Los Angeles, CA 90071-2433
Telephone: (213) 620-7700
Facsimile: (213) 452-2329
BIJAL V. VAKIL (SBN 192878)
bvakil@whitecase.com
WHITE & CASE LLP
3000 El Camino Real
5 Palo Alto Square, 9th Floor
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Telephone: (650) 213-0300
Facsimile: (650) 213-8158
Attorneys for Defendant
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
16
SHARIDAN STILES, an individual; STILES 4
U, INC., a California corporation,
17
Plaintiffs,
18
19
20
v.
WAL-MART STORES, INC.; AMERICAN
INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES,
Case No. 2:14-cv-02234-MCE-CMK
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO FOURTH AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND ORDER
Judge: The Honorable Morrison C.
England, Jr.
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO
AMERICAS 95125486
FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT
1
WHEREAS plaintiffs filed their fourth amended complaint on July 10, 2018;
2
WHEREAS, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3), defendants’ response to the fourth
3
amended complaint is currently due on July 24, 2018;
WHEREAS defendants require additional time to prepare their response to the fourth
4
5
amended complaint in light of their participation in discovery planning pursuant to the Court’s
6
June 20, 2018, order and in light of preexisting time commitments of defendants’ counsel in other
7
matters;
THEREFORE the parties hereby stipulate that the time for defendants to respond to the
8
9
fourth amended complaint shall be extended by 17 days, from July 24, 2018, to and including
10
August 10, 2018. The parties further stipulate that if defendants’ response to the first and second
11
claims for relief in plaintiffs’ fourth amended complaint is a motion to dismiss those claims,
12
defendants’ responsive pleading with respect to those claims shall not be required to be filed and
13
served until 14 days after notice of any denial of the motion to dismiss those claims or
14
postponement of its disposition until trial by the Court.
15
16
Dated: July 18, 2018
WHITE & CASE LLP
17
By:
18
Attorneys for Defendant
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
19
s/ Catherine S. Simonsen
Catherine S. Simonsen
20
21
Dated: July 18, 2018
CONKLE, KREMER & ENGEL
By:
22
Attorneys for Defendant
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL
INDUSTRIES
23
24
25
26
27
28
s/ Mark D. Kremer
Mark D. Kremer
//
//
//
//
-1STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO
AMERICAS 95125486
FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT
1
Dated: July 18, 2018
ALIOTO LAW FIRM
2
By:
3
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
SHARIDAN STILES and STILES 4 U, INC.
4
s/ Jamie L. Miller
Jamie L. Miller
5
6
7
ORDER
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, the time for
8
Defendants to respond to the Fourth Amended Complaint is hereby extended 17 days, from July
9
24, 2018, to and including August 10, 2018. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 12, if Defendants’
10
response to any cause of action consists of a motion to dismiss, a responsive pleading with respect
11
to that/those cause(s) of action shall be filed and served fourteen (14) days after denial of those
12
claims, if any.
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
Dated: July 19, 2018
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO
AMERICAS 95125486
FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT
PROOF OF SERVICE
1
2
I hereby certify that I am employed in Los Angeles County, State of California. I am over
3
the age of 18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is 555 S. Flower Street,
4
Suite 2700, Los Angeles, CA 90071-2433.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
On July 18, 2018, I served true and correct copies of the foregoing document(s) on each of
the recipients listed below:
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FOURTH AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
BY CM/ECF NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING: I caused said document(s) to be
served by means of this Court’s electronic transmission of the Notice of Electronic Filing through
the Court’s transmission facilities, to the parties and/or counsel who are registered CM/ECF
Users set forth in the service list obtained from this Court.
Joseph M. Alioto
Jamie L. Miller
ALIOTO LAW FIRM
One Sansome Street, 35th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: 415-434-8900
Email: jmiller@aliotolaw.com
Email: jmalioto@aliotolaw.com
Mark D. Kremer
Zachary Page
CONKLE, KREMER & ENGEL
Professional Law Corporation
3130 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 500
Santa Monica, California 90403-2351
Tel: (310) 998-9100
Email: m.kremer@conklelaw.com
Email: z.page@conklelaw.com
Attorneys for Sharidan Stiles and
Stiles 4 U, Inc.
Attorneys for Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and
American International Industries
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America and the
State of California that the above is true and correct.
Executed on July 18, 2018, at Los Angeles, California.
/s/ Catherine S. Simonsen____
Catherine S. Simonsen
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
AMERICAS 95125486
CASE NO. 2:14-CV-02234-MCE-CMK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?