Stiles v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al

Filing 225

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 6/6/19 DROPPING 201 Amended Motion to Compel from the court's calendar without prejudice and VACATING the hearing scheduled for 6/12/19. (Coll, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHARIDAN STILES, et al., 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 v. No. 2:14-CV-2234-MCE-DMC ORDER WALMART, INC., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 AND RELATED COUNTER-ACTIONS 18 19 Plaintiffs, who are proceeding with retained counsel, bring this civil action 20 alleging intellectual property and antitrust claims. Pending before the court is plaintiffs’ amended 21 motion to compel (ECF No. 201). Under Eastern District of California Local Rule 251(a), if there 22 has been a failure to meet and confer, the moving party shall file an affidavit to that effect in lieu 23 of the joint statement required under Local Rule 251(c). Because the parties have not filed a 24 timely joint statement, and because plaintiffs have not filed a timely affidavit regarding a failure 25 to meet and confer, the matter is dropped from the court’s hearing calendar without prejudice, and 26 terminated as a pending motion. See Local Rule 251(a). 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. 3 court’s calendar without prejudice pursuant to Local Rule 251(a); 4 5 2. The hearing scheduled for June 12, 2019, at 10:00 a.m., before the undersigned in Redding, California, is vacated; and 6 7 Plaintiffs’ amended motion to compel (ECF No. 201) is dropped from the 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 201 as a pending motion. 8 9 10 Dated: June 6, 2019 ____________________________________ DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?