Stiles v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al
Filing
225
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 6/6/19 DROPPING 201 Amended Motion to Compel from the court's calendar without prejudice and VACATING the hearing scheduled for 6/12/19. (Coll, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SHARIDAN STILES, et al.,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
v.
No. 2:14-CV-2234-MCE-DMC
ORDER
WALMART, INC., et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
AND RELATED COUNTER-ACTIONS
18
19
Plaintiffs, who are proceeding with retained counsel, bring this civil action
20
alleging intellectual property and antitrust claims. Pending before the court is plaintiffs’ amended
21
motion to compel (ECF No. 201). Under Eastern District of California Local Rule 251(a), if there
22
has been a failure to meet and confer, the moving party shall file an affidavit to that effect in lieu
23
of the joint statement required under Local Rule 251(c). Because the parties have not filed a
24
timely joint statement, and because plaintiffs have not filed a timely affidavit regarding a failure
25
to meet and confer, the matter is dropped from the court’s hearing calendar without prejudice, and
26
terminated as a pending motion. See Local Rule 251(a).
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
3
court’s calendar without prejudice pursuant to Local Rule 251(a);
4
5
2.
The hearing scheduled for June 12, 2019, at 10:00 a.m., before the
undersigned in Redding, California, is vacated; and
6
7
Plaintiffs’ amended motion to compel (ECF No. 201) is dropped from the
3.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 201 as a pending
motion.
8
9
10
Dated: June 6, 2019
____________________________________
DENNIS M. COTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?