Stiles v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al
Filing
30
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/28/2015 ORDERING that the application to exceed page limit is GRANTED. Plaintiff may file points and authorities not to exceed thirty (30) pages in length. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Sharidan Stiles
2570 Harlan Drive
Redding, CA 96001
(530) 339-1933
Plaintiff Pro Se
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
)
)
SHARIDAN STILES, an individual,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
)
WAL-MART STORES, INC.; AMERICAN
)
INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES., and
)
DOES 1-100,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
______________________________________ )
CASE NO.:
2:14-cv-2234-GEB-CMK-PS
PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE
APPLICATION TO EXCEED
PAGE LIMITS FOR
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS
AND AUTHORITIES IN
OPPOSITION TO MOTION
TO DISMISS FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT,
DECLARATION IN SUPPORT
THEREOF; ORDER
THEREON
16
17
18
APPLICATION
Plaintiff Sharidan Stiles (“Stiles”) hereby applies for an order allowing Stiles to exceed the
19
page limit for a memorandum of points and authorities in support of the Opposition to Motion
20
21
22
to Dismiss First Amended Complaint.
Stiles respectfully submits that good cause exists to allow her to exceed the twenty
23
(25) page limitation because the nature of the motion to dismiss, involving both federal claims
24
and state claims, the 25-page length of the moving brief and accompanying request for judicial
25
notice render it impossible to address the issues raised by Defendants’ motion within the page
26
limitation. Despite a good faith effort by Plaintiff to comply with the page limitation, it was
27
impossible to do so while sufficiently addressing all the necessary issues in 25 pages. Based
28
-1–
Ex Parte Application to Exceed Page Limits
1
2
upon the foregoing, Plaintiff submits that good cause exists, and thus, the Court should grant
this Application.
Respectfully submitted:
3
4
6
/s/ Sharidan Stiles
Sharidan Stiles
2570 Harlan Drive
Redding, CA 96001
(530) 339-1933
7
Plaintiff Pro Se
5
Dated: May 25, 2015
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2–
Ex Parte Application to Exceed Page Limits
DECLARATION OF SHARIDAN STILES
1
2
I, Sharidan Stiles, declare:
3
1.
I am the plaintiff in this action and I am the owner and inventor of the Stiles
2.
The Memorandum in Support of the Motion to Dismiss is twenty-five pages
4
5
6
Razor.
(25), involving both federal and state claims, and in addition, Defendants’ filed a Request for
7
8
9
Judicial Notice in support. Plaintiff has attempted in good faith to address the issues raised by
Defendants’ Motion within the page limitation provided. Sufficiently addressing the motion
10
and request for judicial notice, Plaintiff anticipates filing an Opposition to the Motion to
11
Dismiss that is approximately thirty (30) pages.
12
13
3.
Accordingly, I respectfully request leave to exceed the page limitation.
I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California and of
14
the United States that the foregoing is true and correct and if called to testify as a witness in
15
16
17
this matter I can and will testify competently as to the matters of fact contained herein based
upon my personal knowledge. Executed this 25th day of May, 2015, at Redding, California.
18
19
/s/ Sharidan Stiles
Sharidan Stiles
20
Plaintiff In Pro Se
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3–
Ex Parte Application to Exceed Page Limits
1
2
ORDER
Proof of good cause having been made to the satisfaction of the Court that the
3
application sought for Plaintiff to exceed the page limit for a memorandum of points and
4
5
authorities in support of their Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss the First Amended
6
Complaint should be granted, IT IS SO ORDERED that the application be, and hereby is,
7
GRANTED. Plaintiff may file points and authorities not to exceed thirty (30) pages in length.
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
Dated: May 28, 2015
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4–
Ex Parte Application to Exceed Page Limits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?