Stiles v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al
Filing
402
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 3/5/2020 GRANTING 362 Motion for leave to file a sur-reply. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file plaintiffs' sur-reply, attached to its motion Exhibit A, ECF 329 -1, as of 2/6/2020. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SHARIDAN STILES, et al.,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
v.
No. 2:14-CV-2234-KJM-DMC
ORDER
WALMART, INC., et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiffs, who are proceeding with retained, bring this civil action. Pending
17
18
before the court is plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a surreply. See ECF No. 362.
On January 22, 2020, plaintiffs filed a notice of request to seal documents. On
19
20
January 27, 2020, Walmart filed a response. On January 30, 2020, plaintiffs submitted their
21
opposition to Walmart’s response. On February 3, 2020, Walmart submitted its reply. Plaintiffs
22
seek leave to file a surreply in response to Walmart’s February 3, 2020, reply. Having considered
23
the parties’ arguments both in support and against the requested relief, and good cause appearing
24
therefor, plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a surreply is granted. The Clerk of the Court is
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
directed to file plaintiffs’ surreply, attached to its motion at Exhibit A, ECF No. 329-1, as of
2
February 6, 2020.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: March 5, 2020
____________________________________
DENNIS M. COTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?