Stiles v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al
Filing
91
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 11/29/2016. The hearing date for all pending motions, Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 64, 65, 71, and 72) and Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike (Dkt. No. 75), shall be continued from December 1, 2016, to January 12, 2017, at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 7.(Deutsch, S)
1 BRYAN A. MERRYMAN (SBN 134357)
bmerryman@whitecase.com
2 WHITE & CASE LLP
555 South Flower Street, Suite 2700
3
Los Angeles, CA 90071-2433
4 Telephone: (213) 620-7700
Facsimile: (213) 452-2329
5
BIJAL V. VAKIL (SBN 192878)
6 bvakil@whitecase.com
WHITE & CASE LLP
7
3000 El Camino Real
8 5 Palo Alto Square, 9th Floor
Palo Alto, CA 94306
9 Telephone: (650) 213-0300
Facsimile: (650) 213-8158
10
11 Attorneys for Defendant
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
SHARIDAN STILES, an individual, STILES
17 4 U, INC., a California Corporation,
18
19
Plaintiffs,
v.
20
WAL-MART STORES, INC.; AMERICAN
21 INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES,
22
Case No. 2:14-cv-2234-MCE-CMK
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR
DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
(DKT. NOS. 64, 65, 71, AND 72) AND
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE
(DKT. NO. 75)
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
Americas 92246019
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANTS’
MOTIONS TO DISMISS (DKT. NOS. 64, 65, 71 AND 72) AND
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE (DKT. NO. 75)
1
Defendants Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Walmart”) and American International Industries
2 (“AII”) (collectively, “Defendants”) and plaintiffs Sharidan Stiles and Stiles 4 U, Inc.
3 (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
4
WHEREAS, on August 8, 2016, Walmart filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ antitrust
5 claims alleged in the Second Amended Complaint (“Antitrust Motion to Dismiss”) (Dkt. No. 64);
6
WHEREAS, on August 8, 2016, AII filed a motion to join the Antitrust Motion to Dismiss
7 and to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 65) (“AII Motion to Dismiss”);
8
WHEREAS, the Antitrust Motion to Dismiss and the AII Motion to Dismiss are fully
9 briefed (Dkt. Nos. 64, 65, 69, 73, and 74);
10
WHEREAS, on October 6, 2016, Walmart filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Lanham
11 Act claims (“Lanham Act Motion to Dismiss”) (Dkt. No. 71), which AII joined (Dkt. No. 72);
12
WHEREAS, on October 10, 2016, Plaintiffs filed a motion to strike the Lanham Act
13 Motion to Dismiss (“Motion to Strike”) (Dkt. No. 75);
14
WHEREAS, on November 9, 2016, Walmart and Plaintiffs, respectively, filed oppositions
15 to the Lanham Act Motion to Dismiss and the Motion to Strike (Dkt. Nos. 83 and 84);
16
WHEREAS, in an Order dated November 7, 2016 (Dkt. No. 80), the Court ordered that
17 Walmart’s reply in support of its Lanham Act Motion to Dismiss and Plaintiffs’ reply in support
18 of their Motion to Strike are to be filed on or before November 23, 2016, and that the Antitrust
19 Motion to Dismiss, the AII Motion to Dismiss, the Lanham Act Motion to Dismiss, and the
20 Motion to Strike are to be heard by the Court on December 1, 2016;
21
WHEREAS, on November 22, 2016, Walmart substituted new counsel in place of its prior
22 counsel; and
23
WHEREAS, to allow time for Walmart’s new counsel to prepare for the hearing on the
24 foregoing motions, they have conferred with counsel for Plaintiffs and AII, and the parties have
25 agreed, subject to the Court’s approval, to continue, to January 12, 2017, the hearing on the
26 Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 64, 65, 71, and 72) and Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike
27 (Dkt. No. 75).
28
Americas 92246019
-1STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANTS’
MOTIONS TO DISMISS (DKT. NOS. 64, 65, 71 AND 72) AND
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE (DKT. NO. 75)
1
THEREFORE, THE PARTIES, BY AND THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE
2 UNDERSIGNED COUNSEL, HEREBY STIPULATE, AND THE COURT ORDERS AS
3 FOLLOWS:
4
The hearing date for all pending motions, Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 64,
5 65, 71, and 72) and Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike (Dkt. No. 75), shall be continued from December
6 1, 2016, to January 12, 2017, at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 7.
7
8 Dated: November 23, 2016
WHITE & CASE LLP
9
By:
10
11
/s/ Bryan A. Merryman
Bryan A. Merryman
Attorneys for Defendant
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
12
13
14 Dated: November 23, 2016
ALIOTO LAW FIRM
15
16
By:
17
/s/ Jamie L. Miller
Jamie L. Miller
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Sharidan Stiles and Stiles 4U, Inc.
18
19
20 Dated: November 23, 2016
21
CONKLE, KREMER & ENGEL, PROFESSIONAL
LAW CORPORATION
22
By:
23
24
/s/ Mark David Kremer
Mark David Kremer
Attorneys for Defendant
American International Industries
25
26
27
28
Americas 92246019
-2STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANTS’
MOTIONS TO DISMISS (DKT. NOS. 64, 65, 71 AND 72) AND
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE (DKT. NO. 75)
1
2
ORDER
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered that all
3 pending motions—Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 64, 65, 71, and 72) and Plaintiffs’
4 Motion to Strike (Dkt. No. 75)—shall be continued from December 1, 2016, to January 12, 2017,
5 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 7.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7 Dated: November 29, 2016
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Americas 92246019
-3STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANTS’
MOTIONS TO DISMISS (DKT. NOS. 64, 65, 71 AND 72) AND
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE (DKT. NO. 75)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?