Stiles v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al

Filing 91

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 11/29/2016. The hearing date for all pending motions, Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 64, 65, 71, and 72) and Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike (Dkt. No. 75), shall be continued from December 1, 2016, to January 12, 2017, at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 7.(Deutsch, S)

Download PDF
1 BRYAN A. MERRYMAN (SBN 134357) bmerryman@whitecase.com 2 WHITE & CASE LLP 555 South Flower Street, Suite 2700 3 Los Angeles, CA 90071-2433 4 Telephone: (213) 620-7700 Facsimile: (213) 452-2329 5 BIJAL V. VAKIL (SBN 192878) 6 bvakil@whitecase.com WHITE & CASE LLP 7 3000 El Camino Real 8 5 Palo Alto Square, 9th Floor Palo Alto, CA 94306 9 Telephone: (650) 213-0300 Facsimile: (650) 213-8158 10 11 Attorneys for Defendant WAL-MART STORES, INC. 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 SHARIDAN STILES, an individual, STILES 17 4 U, INC., a California Corporation, 18 19 Plaintiffs, v. 20 WAL-MART STORES, INC.; AMERICAN 21 INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, 22 Case No. 2:14-cv-2234-MCE-CMK STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS (DKT. NOS. 64, 65, 71, AND 72) AND PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE (DKT. NO. 75) Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Americas 92246019 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS (DKT. NOS. 64, 65, 71 AND 72) AND PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE (DKT. NO. 75) 1 Defendants Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Walmart”) and American International Industries 2 (“AII”) (collectively, “Defendants”) and plaintiffs Sharidan Stiles and Stiles 4 U, Inc. 3 (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 4 WHEREAS, on August 8, 2016, Walmart filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ antitrust 5 claims alleged in the Second Amended Complaint (“Antitrust Motion to Dismiss”) (Dkt. No. 64); 6 WHEREAS, on August 8, 2016, AII filed a motion to join the Antitrust Motion to Dismiss 7 and to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 65) (“AII Motion to Dismiss”); 8 WHEREAS, the Antitrust Motion to Dismiss and the AII Motion to Dismiss are fully 9 briefed (Dkt. Nos. 64, 65, 69, 73, and 74); 10 WHEREAS, on October 6, 2016, Walmart filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Lanham 11 Act claims (“Lanham Act Motion to Dismiss”) (Dkt. No. 71), which AII joined (Dkt. No. 72); 12 WHEREAS, on October 10, 2016, Plaintiffs filed a motion to strike the Lanham Act 13 Motion to Dismiss (“Motion to Strike”) (Dkt. No. 75); 14 WHEREAS, on November 9, 2016, Walmart and Plaintiffs, respectively, filed oppositions 15 to the Lanham Act Motion to Dismiss and the Motion to Strike (Dkt. Nos. 83 and 84); 16 WHEREAS, in an Order dated November 7, 2016 (Dkt. No. 80), the Court ordered that 17 Walmart’s reply in support of its Lanham Act Motion to Dismiss and Plaintiffs’ reply in support 18 of their Motion to Strike are to be filed on or before November 23, 2016, and that the Antitrust 19 Motion to Dismiss, the AII Motion to Dismiss, the Lanham Act Motion to Dismiss, and the 20 Motion to Strike are to be heard by the Court on December 1, 2016; 21 WHEREAS, on November 22, 2016, Walmart substituted new counsel in place of its prior 22 counsel; and 23 WHEREAS, to allow time for Walmart’s new counsel to prepare for the hearing on the 24 foregoing motions, they have conferred with counsel for Plaintiffs and AII, and the parties have 25 agreed, subject to the Court’s approval, to continue, to January 12, 2017, the hearing on the 26 Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 64, 65, 71, and 72) and Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike 27 (Dkt. No. 75). 28 Americas 92246019 -1STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS (DKT. NOS. 64, 65, 71 AND 72) AND PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE (DKT. NO. 75) 1 THEREFORE, THE PARTIES, BY AND THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE 2 UNDERSIGNED COUNSEL, HEREBY STIPULATE, AND THE COURT ORDERS AS 3 FOLLOWS: 4 The hearing date for all pending motions, Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 64, 5 65, 71, and 72) and Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike (Dkt. No. 75), shall be continued from December 6 1, 2016, to January 12, 2017, at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 7. 7 8 Dated: November 23, 2016 WHITE & CASE LLP 9 By: 10 11 /s/ Bryan A. Merryman Bryan A. Merryman Attorneys for Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 12 13 14 Dated: November 23, 2016 ALIOTO LAW FIRM 15 16 By: 17 /s/ Jamie L. Miller Jamie L. Miller Attorney for Plaintiffs Sharidan Stiles and Stiles 4U, Inc. 18 19 20 Dated: November 23, 2016 21 CONKLE, KREMER & ENGEL, PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION 22 By: 23 24 /s/ Mark David Kremer Mark David Kremer Attorneys for Defendant American International Industries 25 26 27 28 Americas 92246019 -2STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS (DKT. NOS. 64, 65, 71 AND 72) AND PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE (DKT. NO. 75) 1 2 ORDER Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered that all 3 pending motions—Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 64, 65, 71, and 72) and Plaintiffs’ 4 Motion to Strike (Dkt. No. 75)—shall be continued from December 1, 2016, to January 12, 2017, 5 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 7. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: November 29, 2016 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Americas 92246019 -3STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS (DKT. NOS. 64, 65, 71 AND 72) AND PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE (DKT. NO. 75)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?