Moores v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 14

STIPULATION and ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/13/15 ORDERING that Defendant's response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is due on 5/15/2015.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration CAROLYN B. CHEN, CSBN 256628 Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8956 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Carolyn.Chen@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 12 13 14 15 16 17 KELLY A. MOORES, Plaintiff, vs. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 18 Case No.: 2:14-cv-02243-EFB ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME OF 30 DAYS FOR DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 19 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective 20 counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of an additional 30 days to 21 respond to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. This is the first continuance sought by 22 Defendant. The current due date is April 15, 2015. The new due date will be May 15, 2015. 23 There is good cause for this request. Defendant is seeking this extension due to 24 Defendant’s counsel’s heavy workload in the last month and an upcoming hearing occurring 25 April 14-15, 2015. In the last month, in addition to her regular district court case workload, 26 Defendant’s counsel was re-assigned an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) 27 case that could not be assigned to another attorney, which required immediate action in 28 preparation for a settlement conference that occurred earlier this week. In addition, Defendant’s Stipulation for an Extension of Time; 2:14-cv-02243-EFB 1 1 counsel has an upcoming EEOC hearing on April 14-15, 2015, which has involved time- 2 intensive preparation, including meeting with multiple witnesses and performing other tasks in 3 preparation for the hearing. Because of the factors described above, defense counsel is requesting 4 additional time up to fully review the administrative record and research the issues presented by 5 Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. 6 7 The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly. 8 9 10 Respectfully submitted, Date: April 9, 2015 LAW OFFICES OF BARBARA ARNOLD 11 s/ Barbara Arnold by C.Chen* (As authorized by e-mail on 4/9/2015) BARBARA ARNOLD Attorneys for Plaintiff 12 13 14 15 Date: April 9, 2015 16 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney By s/ Carolyn B. Chen CAROLYN B. CHEN Special Assistant U. S. Attorney 17 18 Attorneys for Defendant 19 20 21 ORDER 22 23 APPROVED AND SO ORDERED. 24 DATED: April 13, 2015. 25 26 27 28 Stipulation for an Extension of Time; 2:14-cv-02243-EFB 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?