Barrera v. Muniz

Filing 44

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 1/26/17 ordering petitioner's 8/30/16 motion 41 is denied as unnecessary. Petitioner's traverse is acceptable in its current format. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ENRIQUE BARRERA, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:14-cv-2260 JAM DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER W.L. MUNIZ, Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for a 18 writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner seeks to file a traverse beyond a 25- 19 page limit. Court rules do not limit a traverse to 25 pages and the court is not aware that such a 20 limitation was ordered in this case. 21 Accordingly, petitioner’s August 30, 2016 motion (ECF No. 41) is denied as unnecessary. 22 Petitioner’s traverse is acceptable in its current format. 23 DATED: January 26, 2017 24 /s/ DEBORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28 DLB:9 DLB1/prisoner-habeas/ 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?