Patterson v. People of the State of California

Filing 4

ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/25/14 ORDERING that the Clerk randomly assign a district court judge to this case. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Randomly assigned and referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 21 days.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

BRYAN DAMON PATTERSON,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2:14-cv-2262 AC

v.

ORDER AND

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Defendant.

16
17

By order filed October 8, 2014 plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma pauperis affidavit
18
or pay the appropriate filing fees within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would
19
result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. ECF No. 3. The thirty-day period has
20
now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed an in forma
21
pauperis affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee.
22
23

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk randomly assign a district court judge to this
case.

24

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

25

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

26

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one days

27

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

28

with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings
1

1

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

2

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

3

(9th Cir. 1991).

4

DATED: November 25, 2014

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2