Jackson v. Warden of CSP-Solano

Filing 51

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 4/9/2018 GRANTING 50 Motion for Extension of Time. Respondent may have until 6/7/2018 to file his answer to the application for writ of habeas corpus. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RACARDO JACKSON, No. 2:14-cv-2268 MCE DB P 12 Petitioner, ORDER 13 v. 14 15 MARTIN BITER, WARDEN, 16 Respondent. 17 18 Good cause appearing, Respondent’s motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 50) is 19 granted. It is hereby ordered that Respondent may have until June 7, 2018, to file his answer the 20 application for writ of habeas corpus. If Petitioner wishes to respond to the answer, he shall do so 21 by filing a traverse with the Court and serving it on Respondent’s counsel within thirty (30) days 22 of the date the answer is filed. 23 Respondent may file a motion to dismiss on procedural grounds in lieu of an answer, as set 24 forth in the Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. If 25 Respondent files such a motion, Petitioner shall file with the Court and serve on Respondent an 26 opposition or statement of non-opposition within thirty (30) days of the date the motion is filed, 27 and Respondent shall file with the Court and serve on Petitioner a reply within fifteen (15) days 28 of the date any opposition is filed. 1 Respondent has advised the Court that Petitioner is currently in custody at the California 2 State Prison in Corcoran, California, the Warden for which is Martin Biter. Accordingly, the 3 Clerk shall amend Respondent’s designation in the caption for this case to reflect Petitioner’s 4 current custodian, Martin Biter, Warden. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 DATED: April 9, 2018 7 8 /s/ DEBORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DLB:9 DB/orders/prisoner-habeas/Jack2268.answ eot

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?