Hopson v. Big Boy Markets, Inc. et al
Filing
17
ORDER IMPOSING MONETARY SANCTIONS signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 4/27/2015 ORDERING 16 Daniel Malakauskas, Esq. is SANCTIONED $400.00. This sanction shall be paid to the Clerk of this Court no later than 4:00 PM on 5/1/2015, by a check made payable to the "United States Treasury." Proof of payment shall be filed within 5 days of payment. This sanction is personal to counsel and shall not be transmitted to counsel's client. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
CYNTHIA HOPSON,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-02274-GEB-AC
v.
BIG BOY MARKETS, INC.; ARTHUR
TOY AND PATRICIA TOY TRUST;
and DOES 1-10, inclusive,
15
ORDER IMPOSING MONETARY
SANCTIONS
Defendants.
16
17
An Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) filed April 14, 2015,1
18
directed Plaintiff to explain in a writing to be filed no later
19
than April 20, 2015, why sanctions should not be imposed against
20
her and/or her counsel for the failure to file a timely status
21
report. (OSC, ECF No. 16.) No response to the OSC has been filed.
22
Since Plaintiff’s counsel failed to respond to the OSC
23
and failed to file a timely status report without justification,
24
Daniel
25
($400.00). This sanction shall be paid to the Clerk of this Court
26
no later than 4:00 p.m. on May 1, 2015, by a check made payable
Malakauskas,
Esq.
is
sanctioned
four
hundred
dollars
27
1
28
This was the third OSC that issued as a result of Plaintiff failing to
timely file a status report. (See ECF Nos. 6, 8.)
1
1
to the “United States Treasury.” Proof of payment shall be filed
2
within five (5) days of payment. This sanction is personal to
3
counsel and shall not be transmitted to counsel’s client.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
April 27, 2015
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?