Feil v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
44
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/2/2024. The Court SUSTAINS the objections and AWARDS fees in the amount of $10,639.34, payable directly to counsel, Jared Walker, by the Commissioner, provided Plaintiff has no federal debt that requires offset. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANN D. FEIL,
12
13
14
15
16
No. 2:14-CV-02276-TLN-DMC
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
17
18
Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brought this action for judicial review
19
of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Final
20
judgment was entered on June 12, 2017, remanding this matter for further proceedings.
21
The magistrate judge previously granted Plaintiff’s unopposed motion for attorney’s fees
22
in this action under the Social Security Act. (ECF No. 40.) The Court awarded fees “in the
23
amount of $10,639.34, payable directly to Plaintiff by the Commissioner. . . .” (Id. at 2.) Plaintiff
24
filed timely objections requesting the Court direct payment to counsel, as she previously had
25
agreed, “provided Plaintiff has no federal debt that requires offset.” (ECF No. 41.) The Court
26
SUSTAINS the objections and AWARDS fees in the amount of $10,639.34, payable directly to
27
counsel, Jared Walker, by the Commissioner, provided Plaintiff has no federal debt that requires
28
1
1
offset. See, e.g., Fagan v. Berryhill, No. 16-02051, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181992, at *9 (E.D.
2
Cal., Oct. 23, 2018) (ordering similarly and collecting similar decisions).
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: February 2, 2024
5
6
7
8
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?