Avila et al v. Maciejewski

Filing 45

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 03/07/16 GRANTING 40 Ex Parte Application to Stay Civil Action. This action shall be STAYED pending final resolution of criminal case no. 15-01140 in the Superior Court of California, County of Shasta against Defendant, Daniel Maciejewski. (Jackson, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) v. ) DANIEL MACIEJEWSKI, SAVAGE ) ) LOGISTICS, LLC, and NORTH ) COAST FABRICATORS, INC. ) Defendants. ) NO. 2:14-CV-02284-TLN-CKD ERICA AVILA; TAWNYA STANLEY, AS PARENT AND GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR CA; TAWNYA STANLEY, AS PARENT AND GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR CA; ERICA AVILA, AS PARENT AND GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR CB; ERICA AVILA AS PARENT AND GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR MB; AND PAUL AVILA, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY CIVIL ACTION PENDING RESOLUTION OF PARALLEL CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS 25 26 27 DEFENDANTS, DANIEL MACIEJEWSKI AND SAVAGE LOGISTICS, LLC’S EX PARTE MOTION TO STAY CIVIL ACTION PENDING 28 1 1 RESOLUTION OF PARALLEL CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS came before this 2 Court on February 18, 2016. The Court has considered the Motion and the papers 3 in support thereof, as well as Plaintiffs’ oppositions to Defendants’ motion. The 4 Court has determined that the pending criminal case that is related to the instant 5 civil action creates difficulties in Defendant Daniel Maciejewski’s exercise of the 6 privilege against self-incrimination. As such, Defendants’ Motion is hereby 7 8 9 10 11 GRANTED. This action shall be stayed as to the above-referenced defendants pending final resolution of criminal case no. 15-01140 in the Superior Court of California, County of Shasta against Defendant, DANIEL MACIEJEWSKI. 12 13 Dated: March 7, 2016 14 15 16 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?