Avila et al v. Maciejewski
Filing
55
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 9/2/16: Plaintiffs' motion to compel the deposition of defendant Daniel Maciejewski 53 is granted. Defendant North Coast Fabricators, Inc.'s motion to compel the depositions of defendant Savage Logistics, Inc.'s disclosed experts 53 is granted and Defendant Savage Logistics' motion to compel the medical examination of plaintiff Paul Avila 53 is granted. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ERICA AVILA, et al.,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-2284 TLN DB
v.
ORDER
DANIEL MACIEJEWSKI, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
On September 2, 2016, this matter came before the undersigned for hearing of the parties’
17
18
motions to compel. Attorney Mark Thomas appeared on behalf the plaintiffs. Attorney Patrick
19
McIntyre appeared on behalf of defendants Daniel Maciejewski and Savage Logistics, LLC.
20
Attorney Jennifer Capabianco appeared on behalf of defendant North Coast Fabricators, Inc.
Upon consideration of the arguments on file and at the hearing, and for the reasons set
21
22
forth on the record at the hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiffs’ motion to compel the deposition of defendant Daniel Maciejewski (Dkt. No.
23
24
53) is granted;
2. Defendant North Coast Fabricators, Inc.’s motion to compel the depositions of
25
26
defendant Savage Logistics, Inc.’s disclosed experts (Dkt. No. 53) is granted; and
27
/////
28
/////
1
3. Defendant Savage Logistics’ motion to compel the medical examination of plaintiff
1
2
Paul Avila (Dkt. No. 53) is granted.1
3
Dated: September 2, 2016
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
DLB:6
DLB1\orders.civil\avila2284.oah.090216
26
27
28
1
The parties are advised that under the current scheduling order all discovery must be completed
by September 30, 2016.
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?