Sanders v. Delyon et al
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/9/2014 DIRECTING the Clerk to redesignate the 10 order and findings and recommendations filed on 10/14/2014 as an order; and withdraw the assignment of a district judge to this action. It is further ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the 10/14/2014 order, plaintiff's 4 motion for stay and abeyance is DENIED; plaintiff's 5 motion for injunctive relief is DENIED; and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (cc: KJM) (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MILES SANDERS,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:14-cv-2291 KJN P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
G. DELYON, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
On October 14, 2014, the undersigned magistrate judge granted petitioner’s application to
18
proceed in forma pauperis, and directed the assignment of a district judge to review the
19
undersigned’s recommendations that plaintiff’s motion for stay and abeyance be denied, that his
20
motion for injunctive relief be denied, and that the action be dismissed. (See ECF No. 10.) The
21
basis for these recommendations lay in the absence of a constitutional right for inmates to be
22
housed at a particular prison and in plaintiff’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (Id.)
23
Petitioner thereafter filed a notice of consent to proceed pursuant to the jurisdiction of the
24
undersigned magistrate judge for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c); Local Rule 305(a). (ECF
25
No. 12.) In addition, petitioner filed a notice of change of address; petitioner was previously
26
incarcerated at La Palma Correctional Center in Arizona, but is now detained at Mule Creek State
27
Prison. (ECF No. 13.) Petitioner has filed no objections to the findings and recommendations,
28
and there is no basis for modifying the undersigned’s prior conclusion that plaintiff’s motions
1
1
should be denied and this action dismissed.
2
For these reasons, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
3
1. The Clerk of Court is directed to:
4
(a) redesignate the undersigned’s order and findings and recommendations filed on
5
October 14, 2014 (ECF No. 10) as an order; and
6
(b) withdraw the assignment of a district judge to this action; and
7
2. For the reasons stated in this court’s order filed October 14, 2014 (ECF No. 10),
8
(a) Plaintiff’s motion for stay and abeyance (ECF No. 4) is denied;
9
(b) Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 5) is denied; and
10
11
(c) This action is dismissed without prejudice.
Dated: December 9, 2014
12
13
/sand2291.fin.ord
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?