Johnson v. Diggler & Wad, L.L.C et al

Filing 34

CONSENT DECREE and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 08/09/22 CASE CLOSED(Licea Chavez, V)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Center for Disability Access Amanda Seabock, Esq., SBN 289900 Dennis Jay Price, II, Esq., SBN 279082 100 Pine St., Ste 1250 San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel: (858) 375-7385; Fax:(888) 422-5191 Email: Amandas@potterhandy.com Attorneys for Plaintiff 5 6 7 8 Christopher K. Eley, Esq., SBN 90897 221 Tuxedo Court, Suite E Stockton, CA 95204 Tel: (209) 466-8511; Fax: (209) 466-6340 Email: celevlaw@gmail.com Attorney for Defendant DIGGLER and WAD, LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 Case No. 2:14-cv-02296-MCE-KJN Scott Johnson, Plaintiff, 12 CONSENT DECREE AND ORDER v. 13 14 15 Diggler & Wad, L.L.C., a California Limited Liability Company; Hyphy Smokers Club Inc., a California Corporation; and Does 110, Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr. Hon. Kendall J. Newman 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 TO THE COURT, ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 20 21 1. Plaintiff SCOTT JOHNSON, filed this action (known as Case No. 2:14-cv-02296- 22 MCE-KJN) against Defendants seeking money damages and injunctive relief for, 23 inter alia, violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (the "ADA"), 24 Unruh Civil Rights Act and corresponding state law claims, as well as common 25 law claims, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of 26 California on October 1, 2014. Dkt. 1. 27 28 2. Defendant Hyphy Smokers Club Inc. has been dismissed from this matter. Dkt. 15. CONSENT DECREE AND ORDER Page 1 of 5 1 3. Plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment against Defendant Diggler & Wad 2 LLC on March 6, 2020, seeking money damages in the amount of $16,000 and an 3 Order to make the parking, door hardware, transaction counter(s), and restroom(s) 4 accessible.1 Dkt. 22. 5 4. 6 On March 25, 2020, Defendant filed a statement with the court accepting the $16,000 award against it. Dkt. 24. 7 Defendant and Plaintiff (collectively sometimes referred to herein as the “Parties” or 8 separately as a “Party”) wish to settle and hereby desire to enter into this Consent Decree. The 9 Parties hereby enter into this Consent Decree and Order for the purpose of resolving the lawsuit 10 without the need for protracted litigation, and without the admission of any liability by either 11 Party whatsoever, including but not limited to liability as to the issues of damages and/or fees. 12 JURISDICTION: 13 5. Plaintiff asserts that the Court has jurisdiction of this matter for alleged violations 14 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. 12101, et seq., pursuant 15 to supplemental jurisdiction under California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act, and 28 16 U.S.C. §1331, §1343(a)(3) and (a)(4) and §1391(b). 6. 17 In order to avoid the costs, expense, and uncertainty of protracted litigation, the 18 Parties agree to entry of this Order to resolve all claims raised in the above- 19 entitled Action. Accordingly, the Parties agree to the entry of the proposed Order 20 related to this Consent Decree without trial or further adjudication of the issues 21 addressed herein. WHEREFORE, the Parties hereby agree and stipulate to the Court’s entry of this 22 23 Consent Decree and Order, which provides as follows: 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 28 1 This is more fully set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto. CONSENT DECREE AND ORDER Page 2 of 5 1 SETTLEMENT OF INJUNCTIVE RELIEF: 2 7. This Order shall be a full, complete, and final disposition and settlement of 3 Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants and any other parties for damages, fees, and 4 injunctive relief that have arisen out of the acts and/or omissions alleged, or which 5 could have been alleged, in the subject Complaint. 6 8. compliance with Exhibit “A” attached hereto 7 8 The Parties agree and stipulate that the corrective work will be performed in 9. Timing of Injunctive Relief: Exhibit “A” also includes the estimated timeframe 9 for completing the work described therein. In the event that unforeseen difficulties 10 prevent Defendants from completing any of the agreed-upon injunctive relief 11 within the timeframes specified, Defendants or their counsel will notify Plaintiff’s 12 counsel, in writing, within fifteen (15) days after discovering any such difficulties. 13 Defendants, or their counsel, will promptly notify Plaintiff’s counsel when the 14 corrective work is complete, and in any case, will provide a status report on or 15 before December 31, 2022. 16 17 18 ISSUES RELATED TO DAMAGES, ATTORNEYS FEES, LITIGATION EXPENSES, AND COSTS: 10. Per the Response filed by Defendant and the Joint Motion for Relief, the 19 defendant will pay to plaintiff the amount of $16,000 in full and complete 20 settlement of all claims for damages and/or fees and costs of any kind 21 whatsoever. This payment shall be made as follows: Defendant will pay to 22 Plaintiff $1,500 per month, beginning August 15, 2022, and continuing on the 23 15th day of every month thereafter through February 15, 2023; Defendant shall 24 make a final payment to Plaintiff of $1,000 on March 15, 2023. In the event a 25 payment is not made timely, Plaintiff will notify counsel for Defendant via 26 email. Defendant will have ten (10) days to cure. If Defendant fails to cure, the 27 entire amount will be due immediately. Plaintiff reserves the right to seek all fees 28 and costs related to the enforcement of this Consent Decree and Order. CONSENT DECREE AND ORDER Page 3 of 5 1 ENTIRE CONSENT ORDER: 2 11. This Consent Decree and Order and Exhibit “A” to the Consent Decree, which is 3 incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth in this document, constitute 4 the entire agreement between the signing Parties on all matters and no other 5 statement, promise, or agreement, either written or oral, made by any of the 6 Parties or agents of any of the Parties, that is not contained in this written Consent 7 Decree and Order, shall be enforceable regarding the matters of injunctive relief 8 specifically described herein. TERM OF THE CONSENT DECREE AND ORDER: 9 12. 10 This Consent Decree and Order shall be in full force and effect for a period of 11 twenty-four (24) months after the date of entry of this Consent Decree and Order, 12 or until the injunctive relief contemplated by this Order is completed, whichever 13 occurs later. The Court shall retain jurisdiction of this action to enforce provisions 14 of this Order for twenty-four (24) months after the date of this Consent Decree, or 15 until the relief contemplated by this Order is completed, whichever occurs later. 16 SEVERABILITY: 17 13. If any term of this Consent Decree and Order is determined by any court to be 18 unenforceable, all other terms of this Consent Decree and Order shall nonetheless 19 remain in full force and effect. 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// CONSENT DECREE AND ORDER Page 4 of 5 1 SIGNATORIES BIND PARTIES: 2 14. Signatories on the behalf of the Parties represent that they are authorized to bind 3 the Parties to this Consent Decree and Order. This Consent Decree and Order may 4 be signed in counterparts and a facsimile or e-mail signature shall have the same 5 force and effect as an original signature. 6 15. Electronic signatures may also bind the Parties and/or their representative(s) as set 7 forth in all applicable Local Rules. The undersigned counsel for Plaintiff does 8 hereby attest that all electronic signatures are affixed only with the express written 9 permission of the signatory. 10 11 Respectfully Submitted, 12 13 Dated: July 27, 2022 14 CENTER FOR DISABILITY ACCESS By: 15 /s/ Amanda Seabock Amanda Seabock, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff 16 17 Dated: July 27, 2022 18 By: /s/ Christopher K. Eley Christopher K. Eley, Esq. Attorney for Defendant DIGGLER and WAD, LLC 19 20 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 9, 2022 24 25 26 27 28 CONSENT DECREE AND ORDER Page 5 of 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?