Blankenchip et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al

Filing 35

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/30/15 ORDERING that the Pretrial Conference is CONTINUED to 5/9/2016 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. The expert discovery cutoff is CONTINUED to 4/2/2016. The due date for the disclosure of expert witnesses and reports is CONTINUED to 2/2/2016; The due date for rebuttal expert disclosures is CONTINUED to 3/2/2016. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 RANDY BLANKENCHIP AND SUSAN BLANKENCHIP 13 14 Plaintiffs, vs. 15 16 17 CITIMORTGAGE, INC.; CAL-WESTERN RECONVEYANCE, LLC; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. 18 19 20 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:14-cv-02309-WSB-AC Assigned to Hon. William B. Shubb, Courtroom 5 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND TRIAL RELATED DEADLINE [Filed concurrently with Stipulation] Complaint Filed: Trial Date: August 25, 2014 June 7, 2016 21 The Court APPROVES the stipulation to continue pre-trial conference and trial related 22 23 deadline between Plaintiffs Randy Blankenchip and Susan Blankenchip and Defendant 24 CitiMortgage, Inc. 25 /// 26 27 28 /// /// 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Having reviewed the stipulation to continue pre-trial conference (ECF No. 34), and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The pre-trial conference set for March 28, 2016 is continued to Monday, May 9, 2016, at 2:00 p.m. 2. The expert discovery cutoff currently set for December 18, 2015 is continued to April 2, 2016. 3. The due date for the disclosure of expert witnesses and reports currently set for October 2, 2015 is continued to February 2, 2016. 9 4. The due date for rebuttal expert disclosures is continued until March 2, 2016. 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 Dated: September 30, 2015 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?