Blankenchip et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/30/15 ORDERING that the Pretrial Conference is CONTINUED to 5/9/2016 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. The expert discovery cutoff is CONTINUED to 4/2/2016. The due date for the disclosure of expert witnesses and reports is CONTINUED to 2/2/2016; The due date for rebuttal expert disclosures is CONTINUED to 3/2/2016. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
RANDY BLANKENCHIP AND
SUSAN BLANKENCHIP
13
14
Plaintiffs,
vs.
15
16
17
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.; CAL-WESTERN
RECONVEYANCE, LLC; and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
Defendants.
18
19
20
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 2:14-cv-02309-WSB-AC
Assigned to Hon. William B. Shubb,
Courtroom 5
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO
CONTINUE PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE
AND TRIAL RELATED DEADLINE
[Filed concurrently with Stipulation]
Complaint Filed:
Trial Date:
August 25, 2014
June 7, 2016
21
The Court APPROVES the stipulation to continue pre-trial conference and trial related
22
23
deadline between Plaintiffs Randy Blankenchip and Susan Blankenchip and Defendant
24
CitiMortgage, Inc.
25
///
26
27
28
///
///
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Having reviewed the stipulation to continue pre-trial conference (ECF No. 34), and good
cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1.
The pre-trial conference set for March 28, 2016 is continued to Monday, May 9,
2016, at 2:00 p.m.
2.
The expert discovery cutoff currently set for December 18, 2015 is continued to
April 2, 2016.
3.
The due date for the disclosure of expert witnesses and reports currently set for
October 2, 2015 is continued to February 2, 2016.
9
4.
The due date for rebuttal expert disclosures is continued until March 2, 2016.
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
Dated: September 30, 2015
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?