Colbert v. Mule Creek State Prison

Filing 8

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/16/2015 DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED.(Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DALE COLBERT, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-2319-EFB P v. ORDER MULE CREEK STATE PRISON, Warden, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 19 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and is before the undersigned pursuant to plaintiff’s consent. See 28 U.S.C. 20 § 636; see also E.D. Cal. Local Rules, Appx. A, at (k)(4). On October 20, 2014, the court found that plaintiff did not submit a certified copy of his 21 22 trust account statement with his application to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, the court 23 ordered plaintiff to file a completed in forma pauperis application together with the required 24 certified copy of his prison trust account statement. The order gave plaintiff 30 days to file the 25 required application and warned him that failure to do so may result in this action being 26 dismissed. By an order filed on December 2, 2014, see ECF No. 7, plaintiff was granted an 27 additional thirty days within which to comply with the October 20, 2014 order. 28 ///// 1 1 2 3 4 The 30-day period has expired and plaintiff has not filed a completed in forma pauperis affidavit or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, this action is dismissed without prejudice. Dated: January 16, 2015. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?