Barger v. CDCR

Filing 16

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/28/2015 DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

GARY DALE BARGER,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:14-cv-2347 DAD P

v.

ORDER

DIRECTOR OF OPS,

15

Defendants.

16
17

By an order filed March 17, 2015, plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma pauperis

18

affidavit or pay the appropriate filing fee within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so

19

would result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. The thirty-day period has now expired,

20

and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit

21

or paid the appropriate filing fee.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.1

22
23

Dated: April 28, 2015

24
25

DAD:9
barg2347.fifp

26
27
28

1

Plaintiff has previously consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over this action pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636. (Doc. No. 10)
1