Association of American Railroads et al v. California Office of Spill Prevention and Response et al
Filing
21
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/14/14 ORDERING that defendants' 18 Motion to Dismiss shall be heard on 1/15/2015 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Plaintiffs shall file their opposition to the motion to dismiss before 12/5/14, and defendants shall file their reply to plaintiffs' opposition on or before 12/19/14. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Timothy L. O’Mara (Bar No. 212731)
Andrew M. Gass (Bar No. 259694)
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, California 94111-6538
Telephone: +1.415.391.0600
Facsimile: +1.415.395.8095
Email Tim.O’Mara@lw.com
Email: Andrew.Gass@lw.com
Maureen E. Mahoney (admitted pro hac vice)
555 Eleventh Street NW, Suite 1000
Washington, D.C. 20004-1304
Telephone: (202) 637-2200
Facsimile: (202) 637-2201
Email: Maureen.Mahoney@lw.com
9
10
Attorneys for Plaintiff
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
11
[Co-Counsel listed on signature page]
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
15
16
18
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN
RAILROADS, UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
COMPANY, AND BNSF RAILWAY
COMPANY,
19
Plaintiffs,
17
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
CASE NO. 2:14-cv-02354-TLN-CKD
STIPULATION RE SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT FOR
INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY
RELIEF; ORDER
v.
Judge: The Honorable Troy L. Nunley
CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF SPILL
PREVENTION AND RESPONSE, THOMAS
M. CULLEN, JR., CALIFORNIA
ADMINISTRATOR FOR OIL SPILL
RESPONSE, in his official capacity, AND
KAMALA D. HARRIS, ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, in her official capacity,
Defendants.
27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
STIPULATION RE SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANTS’ MTD;ORDER
CASE NO. 2:14-cv-02354-TLN-CKD
1
Plaintiffs ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS, UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
2
COMPANY, and BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY (collectively, Plaintiffs) and defendants
3
CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF SPILL PREVENTION AND RESPONSE (OSPR), THOMAS M.
4
CULLEN, JR., CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATOR FOR OIL SPILL RESPONSE, in his official
5
capacity, and KAMALA D. HARRIS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
6
CALIFORNIA, in her official capacity (collectively, Defendants), by and through their counsel of
7
record, enter into the stipulation below based upon the following facts:
8
9
1.
Relief.
10
11
On October 7, 2014, Plaintiffs filed their Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory
2.
On October 10, 2014, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction (PI
Motion).
12
4.
On October 29, 2014, Defendants submitted to this Court a Stipulation Regarding the
13
Schedule for Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction, which states in relevant part that,
14
subject to the Court’s approval, the parties agree (a) to reschedule the hearing on Plaintiffs’ PI
15
Motion to January 15, 2015 at 2:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the Court is available; (b) that
16
Defendants shall file their opposition to the PI Motion on or before December 5, 2014; and (c)
17
that Plaintiffs’ shall file their reply brief regarding the PI Motion on or before December 19,
18
2014.
19
20
21
5.
On October 30, 2014, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint for
Injunctive and Declaratory Relief (MTD).
6.
On October 31, 2014, Plaintiffs’ counsel contacted Defendants’ counsel regarding the
22
briefing schedule and hearing date for the MTD. Plaintiffs’ counsel proposed that the briefing
23
schedule for the MTD be adjusted to match the briefing schedule for Plaintiffs’ PI Motion and
24
that the hearing for the MTD be consolidated with the proposed PI hearing on January 15, 2015.
25
7.
Defendants’ counsel so agreed.
26
8.
The parties have thus met and conferred and have stipulated, subject to the Court’s
27
approval, to reschedule the hearing on the MTD (currently calendared for December 11, 2014) to
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
1
STIPULATION RE SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANTS’ MTD;ORDER
CASE NO. 2:14-cv-02354-TLN-CKD
1
January 15, 2015 at 2:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the Court shall hear the PI Motion, and to
2
revise the MTD briefing schedule as set forth below.
3
STIPULATION
4
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED therefore, by and between the parties to this action, through
5
their respective counsel of record, subject to court order, that Defendants’ MTD will be subject to
6
the following schedule:
7
1.
The MTD hearing currently scheduled for December 11, 2014 will be consolidated
8
with the hearing on Plaintiffs’ PI Motion and heard on January 15, 2015 at 2:00 p.m., or as soon
9
thereafter as the Court shall hear the PI Motion.
10
2.
Plaintiffs shall file their opposition to the MTD on or before December 5, 2014.
11
3.
Defendants shall file their reply to the MTD on or before December 19, 2014.
12
13
Dated: November 4, 2014
Respectfully submitted,
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Maureen E. Mahoney
Timothy L. O’Mara
Andrew M. Gass
14
15
16
/s/ Timothy L. O’Mara
Timothy L. O’Mara
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Union Pacific Railroad Company
17
18
19
21
Melissa B. Hagan (Bar No. 297408)
Union Pacific Railroad Company
13181 Crossroads Pkwy. N.
City of Industry, CA 91746
Telephone: (713) 220-3207
22
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff Union Pacific Railroad Company
20
23
24
25
26
27
Louis P. Warchot II (CA Bar No. 58567)
Association of American Railroads
425 3rd Street SW, Suite 1000
Washington, DC 20024
Telephone: (713) 220-3207
Counsel for Plaintiff Association of American Railroads
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
2
STIPULATION RE SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANTS’ MTD;ORDER
CASE NO. 2:14-cv-02354-TLN-CKD
1
2
3
Jacob D. Flesher (Bar No. 210565)
Jeremy J. Schroeder (Bar No. 223118)
Flesher McKague LLP
2202 Plaza Dr.
Rocklin, CA 95765
Telephone: (202) 639-2502
4
Counsel for Plaintiff BNSF Railway Company
5
6
7
8
Dated: November 4, 2014
Kamala D. Harris
Attorney General of California
Randy L. Barrow
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
9
10
11
12
13
14
/s/ Nicholas C. Stern (as authorized on 11/4/2014)
Nicholas C. Stern
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendants
California Office of Oil Spill Prevention and
Response,Thomas M. Cullen, Jr., California
Administrator for Oil Spill Response, and Kamala
D. Harris, Attorney General of the State of
California
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
3
STIPULATION RE SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANTS’ MTD;ORDER
CASE NO. 2:14-cv-02354-TLN-CKD
1
2
ORDER
Based on the foregoing Stipulation and recitals, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’
3
Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief (MTD) shall be heard on January 15, 2015 at
4
2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 2 on the 15th Floor. Plaintiffs shall file their opposition to the MTD on
5
or before December 5, 2014. Defendants shall file their reply to Plaintiffs’ opposition on or
6
before December 19, 2014.
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
Dated: November 14, 2014
10
11
12
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
4
STIPULATION RE SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANTS’ MTD;ORDER
CASE NO. 2:14-cv-02354-TLN-CKD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?