Jackson v. Alfaro
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/15/15 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BYRON JACKSON,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-2369 DAD P
v.
ORDER
SANDRA ALFARO,
15
Respondents.
16
17
By order filed March 26, 2015, petitioner’s habeas application was dismissed and thirty
18
days leave to file an amended application was granted. The thirty day period has now expired,
19
and petitioner has not responded to the court’s order.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.
20
21
See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).1
22
Dated: May 15, 2015
23
24
25
DAD:9
jack2369.fta
26
27
28
1
Petitioner has previously consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over this action pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636. (Doc. Nos. 7 & 13)
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?