O'Neal v. Johnson et al
Filing
104
ORDER granting 97 Motion to amend signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/22/16. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SEAN O’NEAL,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-2374 KJN PS (TEMP)
v.
ORDER
AUGUST JOHNSON, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
This matter came before the court on July 21, 2016, for the hearing of defendants’ motion
17
18
to amend the scheduling order. Plaintiff Sean O’Neal appeared on his own behalf. Attorney Sean
19
Richmond appeared on behalf of the defendants.1
Upon consideration of the arguments on file and those made at the hearing, and for the
20
21
reasons set forth on the record at that hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
22
1. Defendants’ June 20, 2016 motion to amend (Dkt. No. 97) is granted.
23
2. Defendants shall file their motion for summary judgment within seven days of
24
the date of this order.2
25
1
26
27
28
The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28
U.S.C. ' 636(c)(1). (Dkt. No. 16.)
2
Defendants shall notice their motion for a Friday at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 27.
Defendants are to contact courtroom deputy Pete Buzo at (916) 930-4128 for an available law and
motion date.
1
1
3. Within seven days of the date of this order defendants shall produce to plaintiff
2
the previously agreed-upon discovery production.
3
Dated: July 22, 2016
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
BVD\o’neal2374.oah.072116
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?