O'Neal v. Johnson et al

Filing 168

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 6/6/17: Final Pretrial Conference is continued to 7/28/2017 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. Jury Trial is continued to 8/28/2017 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SEAN O’NEAL, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-2374 DB PS v. ORDER AUGUST JOHNSON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 This matter is set for a Final Pretrial Conference before the undersigned on June 9, 2017, 17 18 with trial to commence on June 26, 2017.1 However, on May 22, 2017, plaintiff filed a motion 19 for reconsideration and noticed the motion for hearing before the undersigned on June 23, 2017. 20 (ECF No. 158.) On May 25, 2017, the court issued an order advising the parties that the court 21 would address plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration at the June 9, 2017 Final Pretrial Conference 22 in hopes of proceeding with the June 26, 2017 trial date. Unfortunately, upon further review, the 23 court concludes that it is not possible to address plaintiff’s May 22, 2017 motion for 24 reconsideration sufficiently in advance of the June 26, 2017 trial date. 25 //// 26 //// 27 28 1 The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). (ECF No. 16.) 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The June 9, 2017 Final Pretrial Conference is continued to Friday, July 28, 2017, at 3 4 1:30 p.m. in courtroom no. 27 before the undersigned; and 4. The June 26, 2017 jury trial is continued to Monday, August 28, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. in 5 courtroom no. 27 before the undersigned. 6 Dated: June 6, 2017 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 DLB:6 DB\orders\orders.consent\o’neal2374.cont.hrg.ord 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?