O'Neal v. Johnson et al
Filing
8
ORDER granting 6 Motion for leave to file a fifth amended complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/5/14: The proposed fifth amended complaint shall be deemed the operative complaint in this action. Defendants shall file a response to the fifth amended complaint within 21 days of the date of this order. The hearing of plaintiff's October 20, 2014 motion is dropped from the December 12, 2014 law and motion calendar. (Kaminski, H) .
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SEAN O’NEAL,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-2374 GEB DAD PS
v.
ORDER
AUGUST JOHNSON, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff Sean O’Neal is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the
17
18
undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
19
On October 9, 2014, defendants removed this action from the Sacramento County
20
Superior court to this court. On October 20, 2014, plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file a fifth
21
amended complaint, along with a copy of the proposed fifth amended complaint, and noticed the
22
matter for hearing before the undersigned on December 12, 2014. (Dkt. No. 6.)
However, the court has been advised that the defendants do not oppose plaintiff’s motion.
23
24
Accordingly, the court finds that hearing of plaintiff’s motion is unnecessary.
25
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
26
1. Plaintiff’s October 20, 2014 motion for leave to amended (Dkt. No. 6) is granted.
27
2. The proposed fifth amended complaint shall be deemed the operative complaint in this
28
action.
1
1
2
3
3. Defendants shall file a response to the fifth amended complaint within 21 days of the
date of this order.
4. The hearing of plaintiff’s October 20, 2014 motion is dropped from the December 12,
4
2014 law and motion calendar.
5
Dated: November 5, 2014
6
7
8
9
DAD:6
Ddad1\orders.pro se\o’neal2374.lta.ord.docx
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?