Garcia v. Folks et al
Filing
120
AMENDED STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/15/2018 ADOPTING the amended stipulation as an order of the court. (Yin, K)
1 Douglas R. Thorn (CA Bar No. 133521)
Thorn Law Firm
2 1380 Lead Hill Boulevard, Suite 106
Roseville, California 95661
3 916.768.9311
4
doug@thornlawfirm.org
5 Attorneys for Plaintiff Raul Garcia
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
Raul Garcia,
Case No. 2:14-cv-02378-JAM-DB
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
vs.
F. Folks, et al,
14
Defendants.
AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER
Date: October 22, 2018
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Place: Courtroom 27
Judge: Hon. Debra Barnes
15
16
TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES AND ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
17
To save time and allow the Court and the parties to focus on the dispositive issue of
18 exhaustion at the upcoming evidentiary hearing, counsel of record for the parties stipulate
19 to the authenticity of the following exhibits under Federal Rule of Evidence 901 and reserve
20 all other objections to admission:
21
Plaintiff’s Exhibit 1 (Form 22 and response from A. Pruit), the signature of A.
22
Pruitt is authentic;
23
Defendants’ Exhibit 1 (SOMS Movement History) is authentic;
24
Defendants’ Exhibit 5 (Appeals Log from High Desert) is authentic;
25
Defendants’ Exhibit 7 (DOM 54100.6 and 54100.25.2) is authentic;
26
Defendants Exhibit 9 (Pages from transcript of Plaintiff’s deposition) is
27
authentic;
28
SO STIPULATED
1 Date: October 9, 2018
2
DOUGLAS R. THORN
Attorney for Plaintiff
3
4
5
/s/ Douglas R. Thorn
Date: October 9, 2018
/s/ Aseil Mohmoud
ASEIL MOHMOUD
Attorney for Defendants
6
7
8
9
ORDER
The Court has considered the amended stipulation of counsel for the parties and
10 finds good cause to adopt the amended stipulation as an order of the Court.
11
IT IS SO ORDERED
12 Dated: October 15, 2018
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DLB:9
DB/prisoner-civil rights/garc2378.evi stip am
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?