Garcia v. Folks et al

Filing 120

AMENDED STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/15/2018 ADOPTING the amended stipulation as an order of the court. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 Douglas R. Thorn (CA Bar No. 133521) Thorn Law Firm 2 1380 Lead Hill Boulevard, Suite 106 Roseville, California 95661 3 916.768.9311 4 doug@thornlawfirm.org 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff Raul Garcia 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Raul Garcia, Case No. 2:14-cv-02378-JAM-DB 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 vs. F. Folks, et al, 14 Defendants. AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER Date: October 22, 2018 Time: 9:00 a.m. Place: Courtroom 27 Judge: Hon. Debra Barnes 15 16 TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES AND ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 17 To save time and allow the Court and the parties to focus on the dispositive issue of 18 exhaustion at the upcoming evidentiary hearing, counsel of record for the parties stipulate 19 to the authenticity of the following exhibits under Federal Rule of Evidence 901 and reserve 20 all other objections to admission: 21 Plaintiff’s Exhibit 1 (Form 22 and response from A. Pruit), the signature of A. 22 Pruitt is authentic; 23 Defendants’ Exhibit 1 (SOMS Movement History) is authentic; 24 Defendants’ Exhibit 5 (Appeals Log from High Desert) is authentic; 25 Defendants’ Exhibit 7 (DOM 54100.6 and 54100.25.2) is authentic; 26 Defendants Exhibit 9 (Pages from transcript of Plaintiff’s deposition) is 27 authentic; 28 SO STIPULATED 1 Date: October 9, 2018 2 DOUGLAS R. THORN Attorney for Plaintiff 3 4 5 /s/ Douglas R. Thorn Date: October 9, 2018 /s/ Aseil Mohmoud ASEIL MOHMOUD Attorney for Defendants 6 7 8 9 ORDER The Court has considered the amended stipulation of counsel for the parties and 10 finds good cause to adopt the amended stipulation as an order of the Court. 11 IT IS SO ORDERED 12 Dated: October 15, 2018 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DLB:9 DB/prisoner-civil rights/garc2378.evi stip am

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?