Garcia v. Folks et al
Filing
146
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/7/19 ADOPTING in full 123 Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff has satisfied the exhaustion requirement because administrative remedies were effectively unavailable to him. This case will proceed on the merits of plaintiff's claims. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RAUL GARCIA,
12
No. 2:14-cv-2378 JAM DB P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
F. FOLKS, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding with limited counsel, has filed this civil rights action
17
18
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
19
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On April 2, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
20
21
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Defendants have filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
27
analysis.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed April 2, 2019, are adopted in full;
3
2. Plaintiff has satisfied the exhaustion requirement because administrative remedies were
4
5
effectively unavailable to him; and
3. This case will proceed on the merits of plaintiff’s claims.
6
7
8
9
DATED: October 7, 2019
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
_____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?