Garcia v. Folks et al
Filing
44
ORDER denying 39 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/09/16. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RAUL GARCIA,
12
No. 2:14-cv-2378 JAM DB P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
F. FOLKS, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action, has requested
18
appointment of counsel. Plaintiff points to his limited access to the prison law library, his limited
19
education, and the complexity of his case as support for his request.
20
The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require
21
counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490
22
U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the district court may request the
23
voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d
24
1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990).
25
The test for exceptional circumstances requires the court to evaluate the plaintiff’s
26
likelihood of success on the merits and the ability of the plaintiff to articulate his claims pro se in
27
light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. See Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328,
28
1331 (9th Cir. 1986); Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983). Circumstances
1
1
common to most prisoners, such as lack of legal education and limited law library access, do not
2
establish exceptional circumstances that would warrant a request for voluntary assistance of
3
counsel. In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances.
4
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s October 24, 2016 motion for the
5
appointment of counsel (ECF No. 39) is denied.
6
Dated: November 9, 2016
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
DLB:9
DLB1/prisoner-civil rights/garc2378.31
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?