Kruse v. Madsen
Filing
6
ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/12/15 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case. It is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
PAUL DOUGLAS KRUSE,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
15
v.
No. 2:14-cv-02393-KJN P
ORDER AND
BARBARA MADSEN,
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Respondents.
16
17
On October 10, 2014, petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, filed an
18
application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. By order filed November
19
14, 2014, petitioner’s application was dismissed and thirty days’ leave to file an amended
20
application was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not filed an
21
amended application or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
22
23
24
25
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign
a district judge to this case.
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See
Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
26
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
27
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
28
after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written
1
1
objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s
2
Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the
3
specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951
4
F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
5
Dated: January 12, 2015
6
7
krus2393.fta.hab
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?