Barker v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.

Filing 5

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/22/15 ordering that service is appropriate for the following defendants: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Brian Duffy, K. Allen, W. Perehoduk and K. Anger. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

WILLIAM BARKER,

12
13
14
15
16

No. 2:14-cv-2403 CKD P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION, et al.,
Defendants.

17
18

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with an action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

19

Plaintiff has filed a First Amended Complaint (FAC). (ECF No. 4.) Having reviewed the FAC,

20

the undersigned concludes that it states cognizable claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C.

21

§ 1915A(b). If the allegations of the amended complaint are proven, plaintiff has a reasonable

22

opportunity to prevail on the merits of this action.

23

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that service is appropriate for

24

the following defendants: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Brian Duffy,

25

K. Allen, W. Perehoduk, and K. Anger.

26

Dated: January 22, 2015

27
28

2 / bark2403.1amd.new

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE