McKinney v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
26
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/2/15: Stipulation for extension of Plaintiff's time to file a Reply to Defendant's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment is hereby APPROVED. (Kaminski, H)
1
4
SHELLIE LOTT, SBN: 246202
Cerney Kreuze & Lott, LLP
42 N. Sutter Street, Suite 400
Stockton, California 95202
Telephone: (209) 948-9384
Facsimile: (209) 948-0706
5
Attorney for Plaintiff
2
3
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO BRANCH
10
11
VALERIE L. McKINNEY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
No. 2:14-cv-02414-EFB
STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER
EXTENDING PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO
REPLY TO DEFENDANT’S CROSSMOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Defendant.
16
17
18
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective
19
undersigned attorneys, with the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff’s time to file a Reply to
20
Defendant’s Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment in the above-referenced case is hereby
21
extended 31 days from the present due date of October 23, 2015, to November 23, 2015. This
22
extension is requested due to the writer’s heavy briefing schedule and moving to new office.
23
24
25
26
27
28
///
///
///
///
///
1
1
DATED: October 22, 2015
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
/s/ Shellie Lott
SHELLIE LOTT,
Attorney for Plaintiff
/s/ Amanda Schapel for Ellinor Coder
AMANDA SCHAPEL FOR ELLINOR CODER
(As authorized via E-mail on 10/19/15)
Special Assistant U S Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties showing good cause for a requested extension of
Plaintiff’s time to file a Reply to Defendant’s Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment, the request
11
is hereby APPROVED.
12
13
14
SO ORDERED.
DATED: November 2, 2015.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?