Estep, et al. v. Yung, et al.

Filing 12

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 12/2/14: The deadline to submit a joint status report is extended to January 13, 2015.(Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP William C. O’Neill / Bar No. 251071 william.oneill@haynesboone.com 600 Anton Boulevard, Suite 700 Costa Mesa, California 92626 Telephone: (949) 202-3000 Facsimile: (949) 202-3154 Attorneys for Defendants YUEN YUNG and HDYR, LLC 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 12 13 DAVID ESTEP and DEANNA ESTEP, Plaintiffs, 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 vs. YUEN YUNG, an individual; HDYR, LLC, doing business as HDYR; MEKADDISHKEM-EBE, a California corporation; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:14-cv-02418-MCE-AC Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Courtroom 7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT; ORDER THEREON Complaint Filed: June 20, 2014 22 23 STIPULATION 24 WHEREAS, on or about June 20, 2014, Plaintiffs commenced an action in 25 the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Solano, entitled David 26 Estep, et al. v. Yuen Yung, et al., bearing Case No. FCS 043717 (the “Complaint”); 27 28 WHEREAS, Defendants Yuen Yung and HDYR, LLC removed the Complaint from the Superior Court to this Court on October 15, 2014; 1 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT; ORDER THEREON 1 WHEREAS, this Court issued an Order Requiring Joint Status Report (Doc. 2 2) requiring: “Within sixty (60) days of service of the complaint on any party, or 3 from the date of removal, the parties shall confer as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 26(f) and shall prepare and submit to the Court a joint status report that includes 5 the Rule 26(f) discovery plan.”; 6 WHEREAS, 60 days after October 15, 2014 is December 14, 2014; 7 WHEREAS, Defendants Yung and HDYR, LLC filed a Motion to Transfer, 8 or, Alternatively, Dismiss, Plaintiffs’ Complaint (“Motion to Transfer”) on 9 October 21, 2014 (Doc. 4); WHEREAS, the hearing for the Motion to Transfer was set for December 4, 10 11 12 13 2014; WHEREAS, the Court has moved the hearing for the Motion to Transfer from December 4, 2014 to December 18, 2014 (Doc. 9); 14 WHEREAS, it is the mutual intention of the parties to engage in a Rule 26(f) 15 conference, but request that the conference be held after the Court rules on the 16 Motion to Transfer because (1) waiting will ensure compliance with any Local 17 Rules in the event that the case is transferred and (2) the Rule 26(f) conference 18 would be addressed differently if Yung is dismissed; 19 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BETWEEN THE PARTIES, by and 20 through counsel, to request that this Court extend the deadline to submit a joint 21 status report from 60 days to 90 days, thereby requiring a joint status report on or 22 before January 13, 2015. 23 24 25 26 27 28 [SIGNATURES FOLLOW.] 2 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT; PROPOSED ORDER THEREON 1 DATED: December 1, 2014 LAW OFFICES OF VINCENT MARTIN SPOHN, A.P.C. 2 3 By: 4 5 /s/ Vincent M. Spohn Vincent M. Spohn Attorneys for Plaintiffs DAVID ESTEP and DEANNA ESTEP 6 7 DATED: December 1, 2014 HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP 8 9 By: 10 11 /s/ William C. O’Neill William C. O’Neill Attorneys for Defendants YUEN YUNG and HDYR, LLC 12 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 2, 2014 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT; PROPOSED ORDER THEREON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?