Estep, et al. v. Yung, et al.
Filing
12
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 12/2/14: The deadline to submit a joint status report is extended to January 13, 2015.(Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
William C. O’Neill / Bar No. 251071
william.oneill@haynesboone.com
600 Anton Boulevard, Suite 700
Costa Mesa, California 92626
Telephone: (949) 202-3000
Facsimile: (949) 202-3154
Attorneys for Defendants
YUEN YUNG and HDYR, LLC
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION
11
12
13
DAVID ESTEP and DEANNA
ESTEP,
Plaintiffs,
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
vs.
YUEN YUNG, an individual;
HDYR, LLC, doing business as
HDYR; MEKADDISHKEM-EBE,
a California corporation; and DOES
1 through 20, inclusive,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 2:14-cv-02418-MCE-AC
Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.
Courtroom 7
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT;
ORDER THEREON
Complaint Filed: June 20, 2014
22
23
STIPULATION
24
WHEREAS, on or about June 20, 2014, Plaintiffs commenced an action in
25
the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Solano, entitled David
26
Estep, et al. v. Yuen Yung, et al., bearing Case No. FCS 043717 (the “Complaint”);
27
28
WHEREAS, Defendants Yuen Yung and HDYR, LLC removed the
Complaint from the Superior Court to this Court on October 15, 2014;
1
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT;
ORDER THEREON
1
WHEREAS, this Court issued an Order Requiring Joint Status Report (Doc.
2
2) requiring: “Within sixty (60) days of service of the complaint on any party, or
3
from the date of removal, the parties shall confer as required by Fed. R. Civ. P.
4
26(f) and shall prepare and submit to the Court a joint status report that includes
5
the Rule 26(f) discovery plan.”;
6
WHEREAS, 60 days after October 15, 2014 is December 14, 2014;
7
WHEREAS, Defendants Yung and HDYR, LLC filed a Motion to Transfer,
8
or, Alternatively, Dismiss, Plaintiffs’ Complaint (“Motion to Transfer”) on
9
October 21, 2014 (Doc. 4);
WHEREAS, the hearing for the Motion to Transfer was set for December 4,
10
11
12
13
2014;
WHEREAS, the Court has moved the hearing for the Motion to Transfer
from December 4, 2014 to December 18, 2014 (Doc. 9);
14
WHEREAS, it is the mutual intention of the parties to engage in a Rule 26(f)
15
conference, but request that the conference be held after the Court rules on the
16
Motion to Transfer because (1) waiting will ensure compliance with any Local
17
Rules in the event that the case is transferred and (2) the Rule 26(f) conference
18
would be addressed differently if Yung is dismissed;
19
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BETWEEN THE PARTIES, by and
20
through counsel, to request that this Court extend the deadline to submit a joint
21
status report from 60 days to 90 days, thereby requiring a joint status report on or
22
before January 13, 2015.
23
24
25
26
27
28
[SIGNATURES FOLLOW.]
2
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT; PROPOSED
ORDER THEREON
1
DATED: December 1, 2014
LAW OFFICES OF VINCENT MARTIN
SPOHN, A.P.C.
2
3
By:
4
5
/s/ Vincent M. Spohn
Vincent M. Spohn
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DAVID ESTEP and DEANNA ESTEP
6
7
DATED: December 1, 2014
HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
8
9
By:
10
11
/s/ William C. O’Neill
William C. O’Neill
Attorneys for Defendants
YUEN YUNG and HDYR, LLC
12
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 2, 2014
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT; PROPOSED
ORDER THEREON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?