Story v. Mammoth Mountain Ski Area, LLC

Filing 26

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/23/2015 ORDERING that Defendant's 18 motion for a protective order is GRANTED with respect to written discovery but DENIED with respect to the deposition of Tammy Innocenti. Plaintiff's 19 motion to compel the deposition of Tammy Innocenti is GRANTED as stated on the record but shall be limited to no more than two hours of questioning by plaintiff's counsel and also limited to questions pertaining to Ms. Innocenti's 12 /18/2014 declaration submitted in support of defendant's motion for stay. The parties shall contact the Courtroom Deputy of the assigned District Judge to continue the hearing of defendant's motion to stay in order to allow time for the scheduling of the deposition in question and its use in connection with the motion for stay. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

PAUL STORY, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16
17

No. 2:14-cv-2422 JAM DAD

ORDER
v.
MAMMOTH MOUNTAIN SKI AREA,
LLC, a Delaware limited-liability
company,
Defendant.

18

On January 23, 2015, this matter came before the undersigned for hearing of defendant’s

19

motion for a protective order and plaintiff’s motion to compel. Attorneys Mark Greenstone and

20

Christine Pham appeared telephonically on behalf of the plaintiff and attorneys Jordan Heinz and

21

Jeffrey Willian appeared in person on behalf of the defendant.

22
23
24
25
26

Upon consideration of the arguments on file and at the hearing, and for the reasons set
forth on the record at the hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Defendant’s January 7, 2015 motion for a protective order (Dkt. No. 18) is granted
with respect to written discovery but denied with respect to the deposition of Tammy Innocenti;
2. Plaintiff’s January 9, 2015 motion to compel the deposition of Tammy Innocenti (Dkt.

27

No. 19) is granted as stated on the record but shall be limited to no more than two hours of

28

questioning by plaintiff’s counsel and also limited to questions pertaining to Ms. Innocenti’s
1

1

December 18, 2014 declaration submitted in support of defendant’s motion for stay; and

2

3. The parties shall contact the Courtroom Deputy of the assigned District Judge to

3

continue the hearing of defendant’s motion to stay in order to allow time for the scheduling of the

4

deposition in question and its use in connection with the motion for stay.

5

Dated: January 23, 2015

6
7
8
9
10

DAD:6
Ddad1\orders.civil\story2422.oah.012315.docx

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2