James v. Arnold

Filing 34

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 11/10/15: The magistrate judge's October 14, 2015 order is AFFIRMED. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

LOVIE JAMES, SR.,

11
12
13
14

No. 2:14-cv-2433 MCE CKD (HC)

Petitioner,
v.

ORDER

E. ARNOLD,
Respondent.

15
16

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas

17

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On October 14, 2015, the magistrate judge granted

18

Respondent’s Request to File Late Answer. ECF No. 31. On October 26, 2015, Petitioner filed

19

an “Objection” to the magistrate judge’s order. ECF No. 33.

20

Under Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly

21

erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the Court finds the magistrate

22

judge’s ruling was not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Therefore, upon reconsideration, the

23

magistrate judge’s October 14, 2015 order is AFFIRMED.

24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 10, 2015