Johnson v. Agari et al
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 11/25/14 ordering that the time for defendant Daniel Y. Agari to respond to the Complaint in the above captioned matter is extended for a period of 20 days up to and including 12/14/14, to allow the defendant and newly appointed counsel to become acquainted with the allegations of the complaint and respond accordingly. (Plummer, M)
1 Robert H. Panman (SBN 198411)
rpanman@murchisonlaw.com
2 MURCHISON & CUMMING, LLP
801 South Grand Avenue, Ninth Floor
3 Los Angeles, California 90017-4613
Telephone: (213) 623-7400
4 Facsimile: (213) 623-6336
5 Attorneys for Defendant Daniel Y. Agari
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION
10
11 Scott Johnson,
CASE NO. 2:14-CV-02453-MCE-CKD
Plaintiff,
12
ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
DEFENDANT DANIEL Y. AGARI
TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S
COMPLAINT
vs.
13
14 Daniel Y. Agari; Joginder Singh; and
DOES 1-10,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
The Court is in receipt of the partie’s Stipulation for Extending Time for
19 Defendant Daniel Y. Agari to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint.
20 ///
21 ///
22 ///
23 ///
24 ///
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///
1
ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT DANIEL Y. AGARI TO RESPOND
TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
1 Good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for defendant
2 Daniel Y. Agari to respond to the Complaint in the above captioned matter is extended for a
3 period of twenty (20) days, up to and including December 14, 2014, to allow the Defendant
4 and newly appointed counsel to become acquainted with the allegations of the complaint and
5 respond accordingly.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7 Dated: November 25, 2014
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT DANIEL Y. AGARI TO RESPOND
TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?