Johnson v. Agari et al

Filing 5

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 11/25/14 ordering that the time for defendant Daniel Y. Agari to respond to the Complaint in the above captioned matter is extended for a period of 20 days up to and including 12/14/14, to allow the defendant and newly appointed counsel to become acquainted with the allegations of the complaint and respond accordingly. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 Robert H. Panman (SBN 198411) rpanman@murchisonlaw.com 2 MURCHISON & CUMMING, LLP 801 South Grand Avenue, Ninth Floor 3 Los Angeles, California 90017-4613 Telephone: (213) 623-7400 4 Facsimile: (213) 623-6336 5 Attorneys for Defendant Daniel Y. Agari 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION 10 11 Scott Johnson, CASE NO. 2:14-CV-02453-MCE-CKD Plaintiff, 12 ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT DANIEL Y. AGARI TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT vs. 13 14 Daniel Y. Agari; Joginder Singh; and DOES 1-10, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 The Court is in receipt of the partie’s Stipulation for Extending Time for 19 Defendant Daniel Y. Agari to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT DANIEL Y. AGARI TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT 1 Good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for defendant 2 Daniel Y. Agari to respond to the Complaint in the above captioned matter is extended for a 3 period of twenty (20) days, up to and including December 14, 2014, to allow the Defendant 4 and newly appointed counsel to become acquainted with the allegations of the complaint and 5 respond accordingly. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: November 25, 2014 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT DANIEL Y. AGARI TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?