Sandhu v. Chappell
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 04/23/15 ordering a certificate of appealability does not issue. The clerk of the court is directed to process petitioner's appeal. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
HARWINDER SINGH SANDHU,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-2459 KJN P
v.
ORDER
KEVIN CHAPPELL, et al.,
15
Respondents.
16
Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a petition for writ of habeas
17
18
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned.
19
(ECF No. 4.)
20
On January 12, 2015, the undersigned dismissed this action. (ECF No. 5.) In particular,
21
the undersigned found that petitioner’s claim alleging that his plea agreement was violated by a
22
miscalculation of his minimum eligible parole date was without merit. (Id.)
On January 26, 2015, petitioner filed a notice of appeal and a request for a certificate of
23
24
appealabilty. (ECF No. 7.) A certificate of appealability may issue under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 “only
25
if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.
26
§ 2253(c)(3). For the reasons stated in the January 12, 2015 order, the undersigned declines to
27
issue a certificate of appealability.
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. A certificate of appealability is not issued; and
3
2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to process petitioner’s appeal.
4
Dated: April 23, 2015
5
6
7
8
9
San2459.cer
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?