Sandhu v. Chappell

Filing 8

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 04/23/15 ordering a certificate of appealability does not issue. The clerk of the court is directed to process petitioner's appeal. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HARWINDER SINGH SANDHU, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-2459 KJN P v. ORDER KEVIN CHAPPELL, et al., 15 Respondents. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a petition for writ of habeas 17 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned. 19 (ECF No. 4.) 20 On January 12, 2015, the undersigned dismissed this action. (ECF No. 5.) In particular, 21 the undersigned found that petitioner’s claim alleging that his plea agreement was violated by a 22 miscalculation of his minimum eligible parole date was without merit. (Id.) On January 26, 2015, petitioner filed a notice of appeal and a request for a certificate of 23 24 appealabilty. (ECF No. 7.) A certificate of appealability may issue under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 “only 25 if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 26 § 2253(c)(3). For the reasons stated in the January 12, 2015 order, the undersigned declines to 27 issue a certificate of appealability. 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. A certificate of appealability is not issued; and 3 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to process petitioner’s appeal. 4 Dated: April 23, 2015 5 6 7 8 9 San2459.cer 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?