Bui v. Sprint Corporation, et al
Filing
45
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 5/22/15 GRANTING leave to file a second amended complaint. Plaintiff my file a second amended complaint in the form attached as Exhibit 1 to the parties' joint stipulation; defendants shall not be required to file a response. (Manzer, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
VIET BUI and CHRISTINA AVALOSREYES, individually and on behalf of all
other similarly situated employees, and on
behalf of the general public,
Plaintiffs,
14
15
16
17
18
19
Case No. 2:14-CV-02461-TLN-AC
CLASS ACTION
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
vs.
[Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)]
SPRINT CORPORATION, a SPRINT
COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P., a
Delaware Corporation; SPRINT/UNITED
MANAGEMENT CO., a Delaware
Corporation; and DOES 1 through 20,
inclusive,
Hon. Troy L. Nunley
Courtroom 2, 15th Floor
Compl. Filed: July 10, 2014
First Am. Compl. Filed: September 9, 2014
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1Order Granting Leave to File Second Amended Complaint
ORDER
1
2
Having read and considered the Joint Stipulation to File Second Amended Complaint entered
3
into and submitted by Plaintiff Viet Bui (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Sprint/United Management
4
Company and Sprint Communications Company L.P. (“Defendants”) (collectively “the Parties”) on
5
May 18, 2015, and finding good cause therefor, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that:
1.
6
Plaintiff may file a Second Amended Complaint in the form attached as Exhibit 1 to
7
the Parties’ Joint Stipulation to allege claims against Defendants for the failure to reimburse the Class
8
Members for necessary business expenses as required by California Labor Code Section 2802 and the
9
failure to properly compensate Class Members for overtime hours due to miscalculations of the Class
10
Members’ regular rate of pay, and to add Christina Avalos-Reyes as an additional named Plaintiff and
11
class representative.
2.
12
Defendants shall not be required to file a responsive pleading to the Second Amended
13
Complaint. Immediately upon this Order entering the Second Amended Complaint, the allegations
14
contained therein shall be deemed denied by Defendants and subject to all defenses asserted in
15
Defendants’ Answer to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint.
3.
16
17
The Second Amended Complaint shall be deemed served on Defendants on the date the
Second Amended Complaint is electronically filed with the Court.
4.
18
Pursuant to the Parties’ Joint Stipulation and Settlement Agreement, if the Court
19
declines to grant final approval of the Parties’ settlement or if an appellate court invalidates the
20
Parties’ settlement, the Second Amended Complaint shall be rendered null and void and the First
21
Amended Complaint shall be deemed the operative Complaint in this Action. In such event, neither
22
the fact that Defendants did not oppose the filing of the Second Amended Complaint, the terms of the
23
Parties’ Stipulation, nor the allegations in the Second Amended Complaint shall be used or cited
24
thereafter by any person or entity in any manner whatsoever, including, without limitation, any
25
contested proceeding relating to the certification of any class contemplated by the Second Amended
26
Complaint.
27
///
28
///
-2Order Granting Leave to File Second Amended Complaint
1
2
3
5.
Nothing in the Parties’ Stipulation or the Second Amended Complaint shall be deemed
an admission by Defendants.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: May 22, 2015
6
7
8
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3Order Granting Leave to File Second Amended Complaint
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?