Estate of Jayne Bonham v. Burwell
Filing
6
STIPULATION and ORDER 5 for extension of time signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/22/2015. Court is DENYING, without prejudice, parties' Request for Extension. (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ESTATE OF JAYNE BONHAM,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:14-cv-02465-AC
v.
ORDER
SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL,
Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
On January 21, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation and proposed order to extend
18
19
defendants’ deadline to file the administrative record and a responsive pleading. ECF No. 5.
20
Although the court is inclined to grant the parties’ stipulated extension, it cannot because the
21
parties do not specify the duration of the extension they are requesting. The court’s October 21,
22
2014, scheduling order requires defendants to file the administrative record and a responsive
23
pleading within ninety (90) days of service of the complaint. ECF No. 4 at 2. The court’s order
24
also instructs plaintiff to file a certificate showing that he has served defendants within ten days
25
of doing so. Id. The parties’ stipulation includes a request for a 60-day extension, ECF No. 5,
26
however, because plaintiff never filed a certificate reflecting service the court has no way of
27
determining defendants’ original deadline. Accordingly, the court denies the parties’ stipulation
28
////
1
1
and proposed order without prejudice, as the length of the requested extension is not clearly
2
defined.
3
DATED: January 22, 2015
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?