Schmidt et al v. Shasta County Marshal's Office et al

Filing 107

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 3/20/19 CONTINUING the Jury Trial to 7/22/2019 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.. The deadline for the parties' submission of various pre-trial filings and related pre-trial tasks, as set forth in 103 the Amended Final Pretrial Order, is CONTINUED to 7/8/2019. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

CLAYEO C. ARNOLD,
A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION
Clayeo C. Arnold, SBN 65070
Anthony J. Poidmore, SBN 51346
865 Howe Avenue
Sacramento, CA 95825
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JAIME SCHMIDT
TIMOTHY G. YEUNG (SBN 186170)
STEVE CIKES (SBN 235413)
[e-mail]
SLOAN SAKAI YEUNG & WONG LLP
555 Capitol Mall, Suite 600
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF SHASTA (erroneously sued herein as
SHASTA COUNTY MARSHAL’S OFFICE)

16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

JAMIE SCHMIDT, DEBRA KNOWLES,
ELIZABETH SAMPSON, AND RYAN
HENRIOULLE,
vs.

Plaintiffs,

Case No.: 2:14-cv-02471-MCE
STIPULATION AND ORDER
CONTINUING TRIAL AND RELATED
DATES

Current Trial Date:
SHASTA COUNTY MARSHAL'S OFFICE Time:
AND JOEL DEAN,
Judge:
Crtrm:
Defendants.
Proposed Trial Date:
Time:
Judge:
Crtrm:

27
28
Stip And Order Cont Trial Dates

1

April 8, 2019
9:00 AM
Hon. Morrison England
7 ; 14th Floor
July 22, 2019
9:00 AM
Hon. Morrison England
7 ; 14th Floor

1
2

Plaintiff Jaime Schmidt (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Superior Court, County of Shasta
(“Defendant”), through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

3

WHEREAS, during the January 10, 2019 Final Pretrial Conference, the Court notified the

4

parties that the February 25, 2019 trial start date previously set in this matter was no longer

5

available and offered April 8, 2019 as a potential alternative trial date, which the parties ultimately

6

selected.

7

WHEREAS, on January 17, 2019, the Court issued a Final Pretrial Order (ECF No. 99),

8

confirming the April 8, 2019 trial date and stating that “the estimated length of trial is eight (8)

9

days.” The Final Pretrial Order also set March 25, 2019 as the deadline for the parties to submit

10

various pre-trial submissions and complete other pre-trial tasks.

11

WHEREAS, on February 21, 2019, the Court issued an Amended Final Pretrial Order

12

(ECF No. 103), which did not alter or otherwise impact the April 8, 2019 trial date or the March

13

25, 2019 deadline.

14
15

WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiff has had a family matter arisen that conflicts with the
April 8, 2019 trial start date.

16

WHEREAS, the Court has notified the parties that it could potentially continue the jury

17

trial in this matter to July 22, 2019, but could only offer six (6) days for the presentation of

18

evidence, rather than the currently allotted eight (8).

19

WHEREAS, to accommodate counsel for Plaintiff’s family matter, the parties wish to

20

continue the jury trial in this matter to July 22, 2019, with the understanding that they will only

21

be provided six (6) days for the presentation of evidence. However, the parties request that should

22

any additional trial dates immediately preceding or following before or after July 22, 2019

23

become available, they be provided those dates in order to bring the estimated trial length back to

24

the originally allotted eight (8) days.

25

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE THAT:

26

1. The trial date in this matter be continued from April 8, 2019 to July 22, 2019, with

27

the understanding that the parties will only be provided six (6) days for the

28

presentation of evidence; however but should any additional trial dates immediately
Stip And Order Cont Trial Dates

2

1

preceding or following July 22, 2019 become available, the parties request they be

2

provided those dates in order to bring the estimated trial length back to the currently

3

allotted eight (8) days.

4

2. The March 25, 2019 deadline set forth in the Court’s Amended Pretrial Order (ECF

5

No. 103) for the parties to submit various pre-trial documents and complete other pre-

6

trial tasks be continued to July 8, 2019.

7
8

Date: March 14, 2019

9

CLAYEO C. ARNOLD
A Professional Law Corporation

10
By:

11
12

/s/ Anthony J. Poidmore
Anthony J. Poidmore
Attorney for Plaintiff Jaime Schmidt

13
14

Date: March 14, 2019

SLOAN SAKAI YEUNG & WONG LLP

15
16
By:

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stip And Order Cont Trial Dates

3

/s/ Steve Cikes
Steve Cikes
Attorney for Defendant Superior Court of
California, County of Shasta

1

ORDER

2

Based on the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby

3

ordered that the jury trial in this matter be continued from April 8, 2019 to July 22, 2019 and

4

that the parties will have six (6) days for the presentation of evidence. The March 25, 2019

5

deadline set forth in the Court’s Amended Final Pretrial Order (ECF No. 103) for the parties’

6

submission of various pre-trial filings and related pre-trial tasks shall be continued to July 8,

7

2019. In the event that any additional trial dates immediately preceding or following July 22,

8

2019 become available, the Court will provide those dates to the parties in order to bring the

9

estimated trial length in this case back to the originally allotted eight (8) days

10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 20, 2019

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stip And Order Cont Trial Dates

4