Stormwater Systems, Inc. v. Reitmeyer

Filing 38

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/21/15 ORDERING that Defendant's Application 36 is DENIED. Defendant is advised that if he seeks to substitute counsel, he must file a Motion that complies with LR 182(d). (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

STORMWATER SYSTEMS, INC., et
al.,
Plaintiffs,

13
v.

14
15

Defendants.

17

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ORDER

DOUGLAS REITMEYER, et al.,

16

18

No. 2:14-cv-02472

Currently before the Court is Defendant Douglas Reitmeyer’s (“Defendant”) Ex
Parte Application for Order Shortening Time for Motion Re Substitution of Counsel and
Motion to Continue the Preliminary Injunction (“Application”), ECF No. 36. After
considering the Application and Plaintiffs’ Opposition, ECF No. 37, the Court finds there
is not good cause to grant Defendant’s requests. Even on an abbreviated schedule, the
Court would be unable to resolve the proposed motions prior to the deadline for
Defendant’s Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction, ECF No. 34. Due
to the potential prejudice to Plaintiffs, the Court is unwilling to alter the briefing hearing
dates on the Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Accordingly, Defendant’s Application,
ECF No. 36, is DENIED.
///
1

1
2
3
4

Defendant is advised that if he seeks to substitute counsel, he must file a motion
that complies with Local Rule 182(d).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 21, 2015

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2