Benson et al v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC et al
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/19/15 ORDERING that the 2/10/15 17 Findings and Recommendations are VACATED.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
THOMAS BENSON, et al.,
12
No. 2:14-cv-2495-TLN-KJN PS
Plaintiffs,
13
14
ORDER
v.
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
On February 10, 2015, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations
18
recommending that this case be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b)
19
based on plaintiffs’ multiple failures to timely file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to
20
defendants’ pending motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 17.) On February 11, 2015, defendants filed a
21
notice of settlement of the entire action. (ECF No. 18.) Therein, defendants represent that they
22
“have reached a resolution of the claims alleged by Plaintiffs” and that “[t]he parties are in the
23
process of finalizing the confidential, written settlement agreement and anticipate that a request
24
for dismissal of the above-captioned action, in its entirety, and with prejudice, will be filed within
25
the next twenty-one (21) days.” (Id. at 2.)
26
////
27
////
28
1
1
In light of the notice of settlement and defendants’ representation that a voluntary request
2
for dismissal will be filed within twenty-one days, the February 10, 2015 findings and
3
recommendations (ECF No. 17) are hereby VACATED.
4
Dated: February 19, 2015
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?