McNeal v. Cano et al

Filing 4

ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:14-cv-2512) to Fresno (1:14-cv-1767) signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/12/14. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VERNON WAYNE MCNEAL, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-2512 DAD P v. ORDER CANO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983 together with a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 19 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff, who is presently incarcerated at Calipatria State Prison, challenges 20 actions that allegedly occurred at California State Prison Corcoran where he was previously 21 incarcerated. The alleged constitutional violations took place in Fresno County, which is part of 22 the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See 23 Local Rule 120(d). Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action may, on the court’s own motion, 24 be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the 25 Fresno Division of this court. In light of 1996 amendments to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, this court will 26 not rule on plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis. 27 ///// 28 1 1 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. This court has not ruled on plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis; 3 2. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of 4 5 6 California sitting in Fresno; and 2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at: United States District Court Eastern District of California 2500 Tulare Street Fresno, CA 93721 7 8 9 Dated: November 12, 2014 10 11 12 13 DAD:4 mcne2512.22 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?