Johnson v. James et al
Filing
15
STIPULATION and ORDER on Fact re Defendants' Financial Wherewithal and Defendants' Discovery Responses signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/15/15. (Kaminski, H)
5
CENTER FOR DISABILITY ACCESS
MARK D. POTTER, ESQ., SBN 166317
PHYL GRACE, ESQ., SBN 171771
Mail: P.O. Box 262490
San Diego, CA 92196-2490
Deliveries: 9845 Erma Road, Suite 300
San Diego, CA 92131
Phone: (858) 375-7385
Fax: (888) 422-5191
phylg@potterhandy.com
6
Attorney for Plaintiff SCOTT JOHNSON
1
2
3
4
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
) No. 2:14-cv-2520-TLN-DAD
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
Stipulation and Order on Fact
)
Regarding Defendants’ Financial
)
DENNIS JAMES;
Wherewithal and Defendants’
)
CARTER'S TOWING AND RECOVERY LLC,
Discovery Responses
)
a California Limited Liability Company; and
)
Does 1-10,
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
SCOTT JOHNSON,
21
22
JOINT STIPULATION
23
24
The following terms, phrases, and definitions will be applied in this stipulation and are
25
intended to conform to the usage given in the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility
26
Guidelines:
27
28
Joint Stipulation and Order
DAD
-1-
Case No.: 2:14-CV-02520-TLN-
1
ADAAG:
Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines
found at 28 C.F.R. Part 36.
2
3
ACCESSIBLE:
Complying with the technical requirements of the ADAAG.
4
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
Carter’s Towing and Recovery located at or about 2510
Palm, East Nicolaus, California.
5
6
READILY ACHIEVABLE:
12181(9).
7
8
Shall have the same definition as that found at 42 U.S.C. §
BARRIER:
Any architectural or configuration element of the subject
9
property that does not comply with the technical provisions
10
found in the Americans With Disabilities Act Accessibility
11
Guidelines and/or Title 24 of the California Code of
12
Regulations, and which is identified in the Plaintiff’s
13
complaint.
14
15
PLAINTIFF SCOTT JOHNSON AND DEFENDANT DENNIS JAMES, BY AND THROUGH
THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, HEREBY STIPULATE:
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
WHEREAS Plaintiff has propounded written discovery to assist him in determining the
ability of the Stipulating Defendants to undergo “readily achievable” barrier removal and to
support Plaintiff’s damages assessment; and
WHEREAS such discovery information is of a personal and confidential nature and,
therefore, the Stipulating Defendants have a legitimate concern about unnecessarily
producing such information;
The Plaintiff and the Stipulating Defendants enter into the following stipulation:
24
25
26
27
28
Plaintiff: Plaintiff will currently forbear from propounding any discovery that seeks
information concerning the financial status, ability, or wherewithal of the Stipulating
Defendants. Plaintiff also withdraws all discovery already propounded concerning this
information, including but not limited to: Interrogatories, Set One, nos. 4 and 15 and
Joint Stipulation and Order
DAD
-2-
Case No.: 2:14-CV-02520-TLN-
1
Requests for Production of Documents, Set One, nos. 11 and 12.
2
Stipulating Defendants: The Stipulating Defendants hereby declare that in determining
3
whether the removal of a BARRIER is READILY ACHIEVABLE, factors such as the (1)
4
Stipulating Defendant’s financial resources; (2) the facility’s financial resources; (3) the
5
“effect on expenses and resources”; and (4) impact on finances, shall NOT be raised by
6
STIPULATING DEFENDANTS as a defense as to why the Stipulating Defendant cannot
7
remedy and/or remove those alleged BARRIERS. Defendants further stipulate to respond
8
fully to all discovery requests not concerning the financial status, ability, or wherewithal of the
9
Stipulating Defendants within 14 days of the Court’s Order.
10
11
NOTE: Stipulating Defendants are not stipulating (A) liability to the Plaintiff; (B) that the
12
above identified barrier removals are required by law; (C) that the above referenced barriers
13
exist; or (D) that they are subject to the ADA or related state disability access laws.
14
15
NOTE:
The parties understand that the Plaintiff reserves his right to seek financial
16
information in support of a claim for punitive damages. However, Plaintiff will forbear from
17
seeking that information until Plaintiff believes that further discovery information warrants the
18
prosecution of a punitive damages claim against the Stipulating Defendants. Even if Plaintiff
19
reaches a decision that a punitive damages claim should be prosecuted, Plaintiff will,
20
nonetheless, wait until the end of the discovery window to request such information so as to
21
allow maximum opportunity for resolution of the case.
22
23
24
25
26
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
27
28
Joint Stipulation and Order
DAD
-3-
Case No.: 2:14-CV-02520-TLN-
1
Dated: May 3, 2015
CENTER FOR DISABILITY ACCESS
2
By:
/s/ Amanda Lockhart
AMANDA LOCKHART
Attorney for Plaintiff
3
4
5
6
Dated: May 3, 2015
7
MICHAEL D. WELCH ASSOCIATES
By:
/s/ Michael D. Welch
MICHAEL D. WELCH
Attorney for Defendants
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint Stipulation and Order
DAD
-4-
Case No.: 2:14-CV-02520-TLN-
1
2
3
ORDER
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 15, 2015
4
5
6
7
8
Ddad1\orders.civil
johnson2520.stip.disc.ord.docx
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint Stipulation and Order
DAD
-5-
Case No.: 2:14-CV-02520-TLN-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?