Johnson v. James et al

Filing 15

STIPULATION and ORDER on Fact re Defendants' Financial Wherewithal and Defendants' Discovery Responses signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/15/15. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
5 CENTER FOR DISABILITY ACCESS MARK D. POTTER, ESQ., SBN 166317 PHYL GRACE, ESQ., SBN 171771 Mail: P.O. Box 262490 San Diego, CA 92196-2490 Deliveries: 9845 Erma Road, Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92131 Phone: (858) 375-7385 Fax: (888) 422-5191 phylg@potterhandy.com 6 Attorney for Plaintiff SCOTT JOHNSON 1 2 3 4 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ) No. 2:14-cv-2520-TLN-DAD ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. Stipulation and Order on Fact ) Regarding Defendants’ Financial ) DENNIS JAMES; Wherewithal and Defendants’ ) CARTER'S TOWING AND RECOVERY LLC, Discovery Responses ) a California Limited Liability Company; and ) Does 1-10, ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SCOTT JOHNSON, 21 22 JOINT STIPULATION 23 24 The following terms, phrases, and definitions will be applied in this stipulation and are 25 intended to conform to the usage given in the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility 26 Guidelines: 27 28 Joint Stipulation and Order DAD -1- Case No.: 2:14-CV-02520-TLN- 1 ADAAG: Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines found at 28 C.F.R. Part 36. 2 3 ACCESSIBLE: Complying with the technical requirements of the ADAAG. 4 SUBJECT PROPERTY: Carter’s Towing and Recovery located at or about 2510 Palm, East Nicolaus, California. 5 6 READILY ACHIEVABLE: 12181(9). 7 8 Shall have the same definition as that found at 42 U.S.C. § BARRIER: Any architectural or configuration element of the subject 9 property that does not comply with the technical provisions 10 found in the Americans With Disabilities Act Accessibility 11 Guidelines and/or Title 24 of the California Code of 12 Regulations, and which is identified in the Plaintiff’s 13 complaint. 14 15 PLAINTIFF SCOTT JOHNSON AND DEFENDANT DENNIS JAMES, BY AND THROUGH THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, HEREBY STIPULATE: 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 WHEREAS Plaintiff has propounded written discovery to assist him in determining the ability of the Stipulating Defendants to undergo “readily achievable” barrier removal and to support Plaintiff’s damages assessment; and WHEREAS such discovery information is of a personal and confidential nature and, therefore, the Stipulating Defendants have a legitimate concern about unnecessarily producing such information; The Plaintiff and the Stipulating Defendants enter into the following stipulation: 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff: Plaintiff will currently forbear from propounding any discovery that seeks information concerning the financial status, ability, or wherewithal of the Stipulating Defendants. Plaintiff also withdraws all discovery already propounded concerning this information, including but not limited to: Interrogatories, Set One, nos. 4 and 15 and Joint Stipulation and Order DAD -2- Case No.: 2:14-CV-02520-TLN- 1 Requests for Production of Documents, Set One, nos. 11 and 12. 2 Stipulating Defendants: The Stipulating Defendants hereby declare that in determining 3 whether the removal of a BARRIER is READILY ACHIEVABLE, factors such as the (1) 4 Stipulating Defendant’s financial resources; (2) the facility’s financial resources; (3) the 5 “effect on expenses and resources”; and (4) impact on finances, shall NOT be raised by 6 STIPULATING DEFENDANTS as a defense as to why the Stipulating Defendant cannot 7 remedy and/or remove those alleged BARRIERS. Defendants further stipulate to respond 8 fully to all discovery requests not concerning the financial status, ability, or wherewithal of the 9 Stipulating Defendants within 14 days of the Court’s Order. 10 11 NOTE: Stipulating Defendants are not stipulating (A) liability to the Plaintiff; (B) that the 12 above identified barrier removals are required by law; (C) that the above referenced barriers 13 exist; or (D) that they are subject to the ADA or related state disability access laws. 14 15 NOTE: The parties understand that the Plaintiff reserves his right to seek financial 16 information in support of a claim for punitive damages. However, Plaintiff will forbear from 17 seeking that information until Plaintiff believes that further discovery information warrants the 18 prosecution of a punitive damages claim against the Stipulating Defendants. Even if Plaintiff 19 reaches a decision that a punitive damages claim should be prosecuted, Plaintiff will, 20 nonetheless, wait until the end of the discovery window to request such information so as to 21 allow maximum opportunity for resolution of the case. 22 23 24 25 26 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 27 28 Joint Stipulation and Order DAD -3- Case No.: 2:14-CV-02520-TLN- 1 Dated: May 3, 2015 CENTER FOR DISABILITY ACCESS 2 By: /s/ Amanda Lockhart AMANDA LOCKHART Attorney for Plaintiff 3 4 5 6 Dated: May 3, 2015 7 MICHAEL D. WELCH ASSOCIATES By: /s/ Michael D. Welch MICHAEL D. WELCH Attorney for Defendants 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Joint Stipulation and Order DAD -4- Case No.: 2:14-CV-02520-TLN- 1 2 3 ORDER Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 15, 2015 4 5 6 7 8 Ddad1\orders.civil johnson2520.stip.disc.ord.docx 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Joint Stipulation and Order DAD -5- Case No.: 2:14-CV-02520-TLN-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?