Barger v. Director of OPS of CDCR

Filing 13

ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/17/2014 DIRECTING the Clerk to assign a district judge to this case; and RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GARY BARGER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-2525 KJN P v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DIRECTOR CDCR, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Gary Barger, also known as Gary Francis Fisher, is a state prisoner proceeding 18 without counsel. By an order filed November 12, 2014, plaintiff was ordered to submit, within 19 twenty-one days, the appropriate filing fee in order to proceed with this action. (ECF No. 11, 20 citing 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).) Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a 21 recommendation that this action be dismissed. The twenty-one day period has now expired, and 22 plaintiff has not paid the appropriate filing fee or responded to the court’s order.1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign 23 24 a district judge to this case; and 25 //// 26 1 27 28 On December 1, 2014, plaintiff filed a certified trust account statement, along with a handwritten document complaining that prison officials have not been giving plaintiff his applications to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 12 at 3.) However, plaintiff did not address the court’s order imposing a three strikes bar under 28 U.S.C.§ 1915(g). 1 1 IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 2 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 3 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 4 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 5 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 6 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 7 objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 8 parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 9 appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 10 Dated: December 17, 2014 11 12 /barg2525.fpf 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?