United States of America v. Little

Filing 12

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/26/15 ORDERING that the Findings and Recommendations 10 are ADOPTED. The Internal Revenue Summons served upon Respondent Robert Bailey Little shall be enforced in accordance with the terms outlined in the Magistrate Judges Findings and Recommendations.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-2531-JAM-KJN v. ORDER ROBERT BAILEY LITTLE, 15 Respondent. 16 17 On December 30, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF 18 No. 10), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the 19 findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten (10) days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 20 21 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 22 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 23 1983). 24 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 25 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, 26 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 10) are ADOPTED. 28 2. The Internal Revenue Summons served upon Respondent Robert Bailey Little shall be 1 1 enforced in accordance with the terms outlined in the magistrate judge’s findings and 2 recommendations. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: February 26, 2015 /s/ John A. Mendez______________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?