Saud v. State of California, Department of Health Care Services

Filing 38

STIPULATION and ORDER TO STAY LITIGATION signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/21/16. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the litigation of the instant lawsuit be STAYED for one (1) year pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement reached by the Parties at the 8/16/16 Mandatory Settlement Conference. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672 Attorney General of California SUSAN E. SLAGER, State Bar No. 162942 Supervising Deputy Attorney General LYKISHA D. BEASLEY, State Bar No. 282907 Deputy Attorney General 1300 I Street, Suite 125 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 Telephone: (916) 324-3646 Fax: (916) 324-5567 E-mail: Lykisha.Beasley@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendant Department of Health Care Services IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 PHILLIP K. SAUD, 2:14-cv-02536-MCE-AC 14 15 16 17 18 v. MSC Date: Trial Date: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES, August 16, 2016 TBD Action Filed: October 30, 2014 Judge: The Honorable Morrison C. England, Jr. Defendant. Magistrate: The Honorable Kendall J. Newman 19 20 Plaintiff, JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY LITIGATION; ORDER THEREON 21 TO THE HONORABLE MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: 22 On August 16, 2016, Plaintiff Phillip K. Saud (“Plaintiff’) and his counsel and Defendant 23 Department of Health Care Services (“Defendant”) and its counsel (collectively referred to as 24 “the Parties”) participated in a mandatory settlement conference facilitated by U.S. District Court 25 Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. 26 27 /// 28 1 Joint Stipulation to Stay Litigation; Order Thereon (2:14-cv-02536-GEB-AC) 1 Following a fruitful settlement conference and having reached an interim resolution to the 2 disputes before the Court, the Parties jointly seek a stay of litigation for one (1) year pursuant to 3 the terms of the concurrently lodged Settlement Agreement.1 4 WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the requested stay of litigation is for good cause and is in 5 the interest of justice; 6 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED: 7 Plaintiff and Defendant, by and through their respective attorneys of record, have agreed to 8 stay litigation for one (1) year in order to engage in activities in furtherance of the resolution of 9 the disputes which are the subject of Plaintiff’s instant lawsuit. 10 Dated: August 22, 2016 11 By /s/ J. Edward Brooks J. Edward Brooks, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff Phillip K. Saud 12 13 14 Gavrilov & Brooks Dated: August 22, 2016 Office of the Attorney General By /s/ Lykisha D. Beasley Lykisha D. Beasley, Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendant Department of Health Care Services 15 16 17 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 27 28 1 The Parties submit this Joint Stipulation to Stay Litigation and Proposed Order pursuant to the Court’s August 18, 2016 Minute Order reflecting the Settlement Agreement reached by Plaintiff and Defendant. [ECF No. 33] 2 Joint Stipulation to Stay Litigation; Order Thereon (2:14-cv-02536-GEB-AC) 1 ORDER 2 The Court having reviewed the foregoing Joint Stipulation and good cause appearing 3 therefore: 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the litigation of the instant lawsuit be stayed for one (1) 5 year pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement reached by the Parties at the August 16, 6 2016 Mandatory Settlement Conference. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 21, 2016 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 SA2014119011 Joint Stipulation to Stay Litigation; [Proposed] Order.doc 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Joint Stipulation to Stay Litigation; Order Thereon (2:14-cv-02536-GEB-AC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?