Saud v. State of California, Department of Health Care Services
Filing
38
STIPULATION and ORDER TO STAY LITIGATION signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/21/16. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the litigation of the instant lawsuit be STAYED for one (1) year pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement reached by the Parties at the 8/16/16 Mandatory Settlement Conference. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672
Attorney General of California
SUSAN E. SLAGER, State Bar No. 162942
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
LYKISHA D. BEASLEY, State Bar No. 282907
Deputy Attorney General
1300 I Street, Suite 125
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Telephone: (916) 324-3646
Fax: (916) 324-5567
E-mail: Lykisha.Beasley@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
Department of Health Care Services
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
PHILLIP K. SAUD,
2:14-cv-02536-MCE-AC
14
15
16
17
18
v.
MSC Date:
Trial Date:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE
SERVICES,
August 16, 2016
TBD
Action Filed: October 30, 2014
Judge:
The Honorable Morrison C.
England, Jr.
Defendant. Magistrate: The Honorable Kendall J.
Newman
19
20
Plaintiff, JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY
LITIGATION; ORDER THEREON
21
TO THE HONORABLE MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT JUDGE:
22
On August 16, 2016, Plaintiff Phillip K. Saud (“Plaintiff’) and his counsel and Defendant
23
Department of Health Care Services (“Defendant”) and its counsel (collectively referred to as
24
“the Parties”) participated in a mandatory settlement conference facilitated by U.S. District Court
25
Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman.
26
27
///
28
1
Joint Stipulation to Stay Litigation; Order Thereon (2:14-cv-02536-GEB-AC)
1
Following a fruitful settlement conference and having reached an interim resolution to the
2
disputes before the Court, the Parties jointly seek a stay of litigation for one (1) year pursuant to
3
the terms of the concurrently lodged Settlement Agreement.1
4
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the requested stay of litigation is for good cause and is in
5
the interest of justice;
6
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED:
7
Plaintiff and Defendant, by and through their respective attorneys of record, have agreed to
8
stay litigation for one (1) year in order to engage in activities in furtherance of the resolution of
9
the disputes which are the subject of Plaintiff’s instant lawsuit.
10
Dated: August 22, 2016
11
By /s/ J. Edward Brooks
J. Edward Brooks, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Phillip K. Saud
12
13
14
Gavrilov & Brooks
Dated: August 22, 2016
Office of the Attorney General
By /s/ Lykisha D. Beasley
Lykisha D. Beasley, Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendant
Department of Health Care Services
15
16
17
18
///
19
///
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
27
28
1
The Parties submit this Joint Stipulation to Stay Litigation and Proposed Order pursuant
to the Court’s August 18, 2016 Minute Order reflecting the Settlement Agreement reached by
Plaintiff and Defendant. [ECF No. 33]
2
Joint Stipulation to Stay Litigation; Order Thereon (2:14-cv-02536-GEB-AC)
1
ORDER
2
The Court having reviewed the foregoing Joint Stipulation and good cause appearing
3
therefore:
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the litigation of the instant lawsuit be stayed for one (1)
5
year pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement reached by the Parties at the August 16,
6
2016 Mandatory Settlement Conference.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 21, 2016
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
SA2014119011
Joint Stipulation to Stay Litigation; [Proposed] Order.doc
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Joint Stipulation to Stay Litigation; Order Thereon (2:14-cv-02536-GEB-AC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?