Bontty v. N.H.S.

Filing 8

ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/17/15 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court randomly assign aUnited States District Judge to this action; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Randomly assigned and referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&R due within 21 days. (Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RUBEN J. BONTTY,

12

No. 2:14-cv-2537 AC P

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

N. H. S.,

15

ORDER AND FINDINGS &
RECOMMENDATIONS
Defendants.

16
17

A recent court order was served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by the postal

18

service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that

19

a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. More than sixty-

20

three days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service and plaintiff has

21

failed to notify the Court of a current address.

22
23
24
25
26

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court randomly assign a
United States District Judge to this action; and
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for
failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b).
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

27

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one days

28

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
1

1

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings

2

and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen

3

days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

4

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

5

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

6

DATED: March 17, 2015

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2