Holshouser v. County of Modoc, et al

Filing 72

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/13/16 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 68 ex parte application is granted in part and denied in part. The court declines to strike the notice of errata. Plaintiff is granted an extension of time to 10/31/2016 to file opposition. Reply, if any, shall be filed no later than 11/7/2016. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SARAH HOLSHOUSER, 12 No. 2:14-cv-2552 CKD Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 COUNTY OF MODOC, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff has filed an ex parte application for an order striking defendants’ notice of errata 17 18 submitted in connection with defendants’ motion for summary judgment. In the alternative, 19 plaintiff seeks an extension of time to oppose the motion for summary judgment. Defendants 20 have filed an opposition to the ex parte application. Upon review of the application, the 21 documents in support and opposition, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 22 that: 1. Plaintiff’s ex parte application (ECF No. 68) is granted in part and denied in part. The 23 24 court declines to strike the notice of errata. Plaintiff is granted an extension of time to October 25 31, 2016 to file opposition. 26 ///// 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 1 2 2. Reply, if any, shall be filed no later than November 7, 2016. Dated: October 13, 2016 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 3 4 5 6 7 4 holshouser2552.eot 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?