Knight v. People of the State of California
Filing
15
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 06/16/15 ordering that within 21 days of the date of service of this order, petitioner shall show cause in writing why this court should not grant the pending motion to dismiss the petition. Alternatively, if petitioner no longer wishes to proceed with this federal habeas action, he may file a request to voluntarily dismiss this case. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
VONTRE KNIGHT,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-2565 TLN DAD P
v.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
STU SHERMAN, Warden,
15
Respondent.
16
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus
17
18
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On May 5, 2015, respondent filed a motion to dismiss the pending
19
federal habeas petition as premature in light of the fact that petitioner has a direct appeal
20
challenging the judgment of conviction at issue currently pending before the California Court of
21
Appeal. Petitioner has not filed an opposition to the motion to dismiss. Local Rule 230(l)
22
provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement
23
of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .”
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one days of the
24
25
date of service of this order, petitioner shall show cause in writing why this court should not grant
26
/////
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
the pending motion to dismiss the petition. Alternatively, if petitioner no longer wishes to
2
proceed with this federal habeas action, he may file a request to voluntarily dismiss this case.
3
Dated: June 16, 2015
4
5
6
7
DAD:9
knig2565.102
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?