Special Situations Fund III QP, L.P. et al v. Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. et al
Filing
33
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/3/2015 ORDERING 32 Lead Plaintiffs shall file and serve the Consolidated Complaint no later than 60 days after MBII announces the Restatement(s); Defendants shall file and serve any responsive pleading(s) or motion(s) to dismiss no later than 60 days after the filing and service of the Consolidated Complaint 22 . (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
JORDAN ETH (CA SBN 121617)
JEth@mofo.com
JUDSON E. LOBDELL (CA SBN 146041)
JLobdell@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: 415.268.7000
10
Attorneys for Defendants
MARRONE BIO INNOVATIONS, INC., PAMELA G.
MARRONE, JAMES B. BOYD, DONALD J. GLIDEWELL,
ELIN MILLER, RANJEET BHATIA, PAMELA CONTAG, TIM
FOGARTY, LAWRENCE HOUGH, JOSEPH HUDSON, LES
LYMAN, RICHARD ROMINGER, SHAUGN STANLEY,
SEAN SCHICKEDANZ
11
(Additional Counsel on Signature Page)
7
8
9
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
16
17
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND III QP, L.P.,
AND SPECIAL SITUATIONS CAYMAN
FUND, L.P, Individually and On Behalf of
All Others Similarly Situated,
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Plaintiffs,
vs.
MARRONE BIO INNOVATIONS, INC.,
PAMELA G. MARRONE, JAMES B.
BOYD, DONALD J. GLIDEWELL,
HECTOR ABSI, ELIN MILLER, RANJEET
BHATIA, PAMELA CONTAG, TIM
FOGARTY, LAWRENCE HOUGH,
JOSEPH HUDSON, LES LYMAN,
RICHARD ROMINGER and SHAUGN
STANLEY,
26
27
28
Master File No.: 2:14-cv-2571-MCE-KJN
Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.
CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION
STIPULATION AND ORDER (1)
SETTING TIME FOR FILING OF
CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION
COMPLAINT AND (2)
ESTABLISHING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSIVE
MOTION(S)
Defendants.
(caption continued on the following page)
STIPULATION AND ORDER (1) SETTING TIME FOR FILING OF CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND (2)
ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSIVE MOTION(S)
MASTER FILE NO. : 2:14-CV-2571-MCE-KJN
sf-3538812
1
2
JOANN N. MARTINELLI, Individually and
On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
3
4
5
6
7
Plaintiff,
vs.
MARRONE BIO INNOVATIONS, INC.,
PAMELA G. MARRONE, DONALD J.
GLIDEWELL, and JAMES B. BOYD,
Defendants.
8
9
10
PAUL SAUSMAN, Individually and On
Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
vs.
MARRONE BIO INNOVATIONS, INC.,
PAMELA G. MARRONE, DONALD J.
GLIDEWELL, and JAMES B. BOYD,
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
SUSCHIA CHEN, Individually and On
Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
Plaintiff,
20
21
22
23
24
vs.
MARRONE BIO INNOVATIONS, INC.,
PAMELA G. MARRONE, DONALD J.
GLIDEWELL, and JAMES B. BOYD,
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
(caption continued on the following page)
STIPULATION AND ORDER (1) SETTING TIME FOR FILING OF CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND (2)
ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSIVE MOTION(S)
MASTER FILE NO. : 2:14-CV-2571-MCE-KJN
sf-3538812
1
2
KENT OLDHAM, Individually and On
Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
3
Plaintiff,
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
vs.
MARRONE BIO INNOVATIONS, INC.,
JAMES B. BOYD, DONALD J.
GLIDEWELL, PAMELA G. MARRONE,
RANJEET BHATIA, TIM FOGARTY,
LAWRENCE HOUGH, JOSEPH HUDSON,
RICHARD ROMINGER, SEAN
SCHICKEDANZ, SHAUGN STANLEY,
PIPER JAFFRAY & CO., STIFEL,
NICOLAUS & COMPANY,
INCORPORATED, ROTH CAPITAL
PARTNERS, LLC, and JEFFERIES LLC,
Defendants.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER (1) SETTING TIME FOR FILING OF CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND (2)
ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSIVE MOTION(S)
MASTER FILE NO. : 2:14-CV-2571-MCE-KJN
sf-3538812
1
Lead Plaintiffs Special Situations Fund III QP, L.P. and Special Situations Cayman
2
Fund, L.P. (“Lead Plaintiffs”) and Defendants Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. (“MBII” or “the
3
Company”), Pamela G. Marrone, James B. Boyd, Donald J. Glidewell, Hector Absi, Elin Miller,
4
Ranjeet Bhatia, Pamela Contag, Tim Fogarty, Lawrence Hough, Joseph Hudson, Les Lyman,
5
Richard Rominger, Shaugn Stanley, and Sean Schickedanz (collectively, “Defendants”), by and
6
through their respective counsel hereby recite and stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court,
7
the following as concerns (1) the filing of a consolidated class action complaint (“Consolidated
8
Complaint”), and (2) the briefing schedule for any responsive motions.
9
RECITALS
10
WHEREAS Lead Plaintiffs filed a class action complaint on November 3, 2014 [Docket
11
No. 1], alleging that Defendants engaged in conduct that violates the federal securities laws,
12
specifically Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the
13
Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
14
15
WHEREAS the claims in this action are subject to the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995 (the “PSLRA”);
16
WHEREAS counsel for Defendants accepted service of the initial complaint on
17
Defendants’ behalf, and the parties entered into a stipulation continuing the date by which
18
Defendants must answer or otherwise respond to the complaint until after the Court issued an
19
order pursuant to the PSLRA appointing lead plaintiff(s) and lead counsel [Docket No. 13];
20
WHEREAS the parties further stipulated that counsel for Defendants would meet and
21
confer with the Court-appointed lead counsel within twenty (20) days following the Court’s
22
order appointing lead plaintiff(s) and lead counsel, to determine (i) whether the lead plaintiff(s)
23
will file a Consolidated Complaint, (ii) establish a common response date for all defendants,
24
including a briefing schedule on anticipated motions to dismiss, and (iii) establish a date by
25
which to provide the Court with a Joint Status Report;
26
WHEREAS by Order dated February 13, 2015 [Docket No. 18], this Court consolidated
27
the actions denominated as Martinelli v. Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc., No. 2:14-cv-2055-
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER (1) SETTING TIME FOR FILING OF CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND (2)
ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSIVE MOTION(S)
MASTER FILE NO. : 2:14-CV-2571-MCE-KJN
sf-3538812
1
MCE-KJN, Sausman v. Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc., No. 2:14-cv-2072-MCE-KJN, Chen v.
2
Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc., 2:14-cv-2105-MCE-KJN, Oldham v. Marrone Bio Innovations,
3
Inc., 2:14-cv-2130-MCE-KJN, and Special Situations Fund III QP, L.P. v. Marrone Bio
4
Innovations, Inc., No. 2:14-cv-2571-MCE-KJN, designating No. 2:14-cv-2571 as the Master
5
File and administratively closing all of the other consolidated cases;
6
WHEREAS by that same Order, the Court appointed Special Situations Fund III QP,
7
L.P. and Special Situations Cayman Fund, L.P. as Lead Plaintiffs, and Lowenstein Sandler LLP
8
as Lead Counsel;
9
WHEREAS MBII has previously announced that the independent Audit Committee
10
investigation of certain revenue recognition issues is substantially completed, and that, in light
11
of the Audit Committee’s findings, MBII’s management is evaluating the necessity, nature and
12
scope of any restatements to any of MBII’s financial statements previously filed with the
13
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) (the “Financial Statement Review”);
14
WHEREAS Lead Plaintiffs intend to file a Consolidated Complaint, and Defendants
15
have indicated that they intend to move to dismiss the Consolidated Complaint pursuant to Fed.
16
R. Civ. P. 12 and any other applicable law;
17
18
WHEREAS pursuant to the PSLRA, 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(b)(3)(B), all discovery in this
consolidated class action is automatically stayed by operation of law;
19
WHEREAS by Order dated April 16, 2015 [Docket No. 27], this Court directed
20
Plaintiffs to file and serve the Consolidated Complaint no later than thirty (30) days after MBII
21
announces the results of the Financial Statement Review and, if MBII does not announce the
22
results of the Financial Statement Review by May 13, 2015, file and serve the Consolidated
23
Complaint no later than June 1, 2015;
24
WHEREAS on April 23, 2015, MBII announced that (i) its Audit Committee concluded,
25
after consultation with management, that certain financial statements should no longer be relied
26
upon, and (ii) although the Company expects to restate certain of its previously filed financial
27
statements, the Company’s evaluation process is ongoing and, accordingly, the Company cannot
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER (1) SETTING TIME FOR FILING OF CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND (2)
ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSIVE MOTION(S)
MASTER FILE NO. : 2:14-CV-2571-MCE-KJN
sf-3538812
1
at this time provide an estimate of the timing, extent, or effect of such restatement (the
2
“Restatement(s)”);
3
4
WHEREAS the Restatement(s) may impact the allegations in the Consolidated
Complaint;
5
WHEREAS although Lead Plaintiffs may properly file the Consolidated Complaint at
6
any time, undersigned counsel agree that the interests of justice would be best served by an
7
order directing Lead Plaintiffs to file the Consolidated Complaint after MBII announces the
8
results of the Restatement(s), so as to avoid the expense and delay that would be incurred by
9
further amending the Consolidated Complaint should the Restatement(s) be announced while
10
Defendants’ anticipated motion(s) to dismiss are being briefed.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
STIPULATION
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by Lead Plaintiffs and
Defendants, through their respective counsel of record, as follows:
1.
Lead Plaintiffs shall file and serve the Consolidated Complaint no later than sixty
(60) days after MBII announces the Restatement(s).
2.
Defendants shall file and serve any responsive pleading(s) or motion(s) to
dismiss no later than sixty (60) days after the filing and service of the Consolidated Complaint.
3.
If a motion to dismiss is filed, Lead Plaintiffs shall file and serve their opposition
20
brief(s) no later than forty-five (45) days after Defendants file and serve their motion(s) to
21
dismiss.
22
4.
Defendants shall file and serve their reply(ies) in further support of the motion(s)
23
to dismiss no later than twenty-one (21) days after Lead Plaintiffs file and serve their opposition
24
brief(s).
25
5.
In the event Defendants’ motion(s) to dismiss are denied in whole or in part,
26
Lead Plaintiffs and Defendants shall meet and confer within forty-five (45) days of the Court’s
27
disposition of Defendants’ motion(s) to dismiss to address the discovery-related topics set forth
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER (1) SETTING TIME FOR FILING OF CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND (2)
ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSIVE MOTION(S)
MASTER FILE NO. : 2:14-CV-2571-MCE-KJN
sf-3538812
1
in the Court’s Order Requiring Joint Status Report and will thereafter submit to the Court a Rule
2
26(f) discovery plan consistent with that Order.
3
4
5
DATED: May 27, 2015
6
LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP
By:
7
8
9
10
11
/s/ Michael J. McGaughey
(As authorized on May 27, 2015)
Michael J. McGaughey
Lowenstein Sandler LLP
390 Lytton Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Telephone: 415-288-4545
Fax: 415-288-4534
mmcgaughey@lowenstein.com
Lawrence M. Rolnick (pro hac vice)
Steven M. Hecht (pro hac vice)
Thomas E. Redburn, Jr. (pro hac vice)
Lowenstein Sandler LLP
1251 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10020
-and65 Livingston Avenue
Roseland, NJ 07068
Telephone: 212-262-6700
Fax: 973-597-2400
lrolnick@lowenstein.com
shecht@lowenstein.com
tredburn@lowenstein.com
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs Special
Situations Fund III QP, L.P. and Special
Situations Cayman Fund, L.P.
21
22
23
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
24
By:
25
26
27
28
/s/Judson E. Lobdell
Judson E. Lobdell
JLobdell@mofo.com
Jordan Eth
JEth@mofo.com
STIPULATION AND ORDER (1) SETTING TIME FOR FILING OF CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND (2)
ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSIVE MOTION(S)
MASTER FILE NO. : 2:14-CV-2571-MCE-KJN
sf-3538812
Morrison & Foerster LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: 415-268-7000
Facsimile: 415-268-7522
1
2
3
4
Counsel for Defendants Marrone Bio
Innovations, Inc., Pamela G. Marrone,
James B. Boyd, Donald J. Glidewell, Elin
Miller, Ranjeet Bhatia, Pamela Contag,
Tim Fogarty, Lawrence Hough, Joseph
Hudson, Les Lyman, Richard Rominger,
Shaugn Stanley, and Sean Schickedanz
5
6
7
8
9
BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER
SCHRECK LLP
10
11
By:
12
13
14
15
16
/s/ Jonathan C. Sandler
(As authorized on May 27, 2015)
Jonathan C. Sandler
2049 Century Park East, Suite 3550
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: 310-500-4600
Facsimile: 310-500-4602
Counsel for Defendant Hector Absi
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER (1) SETTING TIME FOR FILING OF CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND (2)
ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSIVE MOTION(S)
MASTER FILE NO. : 2:14-CV-2571-MCE-KJN
sf-3538812
ORDER
1
2
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, it is hereby ordered that:
3
1.
4
5
6
7
Lead Plaintiffs shall file and serve the Consolidated Complaint no later than sixty
(60) days after MBII announces the Restatement(s).
2.
Defendants shall file and serve any responsive pleading(s) or motion(s) to
dismiss no later than sixty (60) days after the filing and service of the Consolidated Complaint.
3.
If a motion to dismiss is filed, Lead Plaintiffs shall file and serve their opposition
8
brief(s) no later than forty-five (45) days after Defendants file and serve their motion(s) to
9
dismiss.
10
4.
Defendants shall file and serve their reply(ies) in further support of the motion(s)
11
to dismiss no later than twenty-one (21) days after Lead Plaintiffs file and serve their opposition
12
brief(s).
13
5.
In the event Defendants’ motion(s) to dismiss are denied in whole or in part,
14
Lead Plaintiffs and Defendants shall meet and confer within forty-five (45) days of the Court’s
15
disposition of Defendants’ motion(s) to dismiss to address the discovery-related topics set forth
16
in the Court’s Order Requiring Joint Status Report and will thereafter submit to the Court a Rule
17
26(f) discovery plan consistent with that Order.
18
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 3, 2015
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER (1) SETTING TIME FOR FILING OF CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND (2)
ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSIVE MOTION(S)
MASTER FILE NO. : 2:14-CV-2571-MCE-KJN
sf-3538812
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?