Special Situations Fund III QP, L.P. et al v. Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. et al

Filing 33

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/3/2015 ORDERING 32 Lead Plaintiffs shall file and serve the Consolidated Complaint no later than 60 days after MBII announces the Restatement(s); Defendants shall file and serve any responsive pleading(s) or motion(s) to dismiss no later than 60 days after the filing and service of the Consolidated Complaint 22 . (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 JORDAN ETH (CA SBN 121617) JEth@mofo.com JUDSON E. LOBDELL (CA SBN 146041) JLobdell@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: 415.268.7000 10 Attorneys for Defendants MARRONE BIO INNOVATIONS, INC., PAMELA G. MARRONE, JAMES B. BOYD, DONALD J. GLIDEWELL, ELIN MILLER, RANJEET BHATIA, PAMELA CONTAG, TIM FOGARTY, LAWRENCE HOUGH, JOSEPH HUDSON, LES LYMAN, RICHARD ROMINGER, SHAUGN STANLEY, SEAN SCHICKEDANZ 11 (Additional Counsel on Signature Page) 7 8 9 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 17 SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND III QP, L.P., AND SPECIAL SITUATIONS CAYMAN FUND, L.P, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Plaintiffs, vs. MARRONE BIO INNOVATIONS, INC., PAMELA G. MARRONE, JAMES B. BOYD, DONALD J. GLIDEWELL, HECTOR ABSI, ELIN MILLER, RANJEET BHATIA, PAMELA CONTAG, TIM FOGARTY, LAWRENCE HOUGH, JOSEPH HUDSON, LES LYMAN, RICHARD ROMINGER and SHAUGN STANLEY, 26 27 28 Master File No.: 2:14-cv-2571-MCE-KJN Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION STIPULATION AND ORDER (1) SETTING TIME FOR FILING OF CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND (2) ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSIVE MOTION(S) Defendants. (caption continued on the following page) STIPULATION AND ORDER (1) SETTING TIME FOR FILING OF CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND (2) ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSIVE MOTION(S) MASTER FILE NO. : 2:14-CV-2571-MCE-KJN sf-3538812 1 2 JOANN N. MARTINELLI, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 3 4 5 6 7 Plaintiff, vs. MARRONE BIO INNOVATIONS, INC., PAMELA G. MARRONE, DONALD J. GLIDEWELL, and JAMES B. BOYD, Defendants. 8 9 10 PAUL SAUSMAN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 vs. MARRONE BIO INNOVATIONS, INC., PAMELA G. MARRONE, DONALD J. GLIDEWELL, and JAMES B. BOYD, Defendants. 16 17 18 19 SUSCHIA CHEN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, 20 21 22 23 24 vs. MARRONE BIO INNOVATIONS, INC., PAMELA G. MARRONE, DONALD J. GLIDEWELL, and JAMES B. BOYD, Defendants. 25 26 27 28 (caption continued on the following page) STIPULATION AND ORDER (1) SETTING TIME FOR FILING OF CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND (2) ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSIVE MOTION(S) MASTER FILE NO. : 2:14-CV-2571-MCE-KJN sf-3538812 1 2 KENT OLDHAM, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 3 Plaintiff, 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 vs. MARRONE BIO INNOVATIONS, INC., JAMES B. BOYD, DONALD J. GLIDEWELL, PAMELA G. MARRONE, RANJEET BHATIA, TIM FOGARTY, LAWRENCE HOUGH, JOSEPH HUDSON, RICHARD ROMINGER, SEAN SCHICKEDANZ, SHAUGN STANLEY, PIPER JAFFRAY & CO., STIFEL, NICOLAUS & COMPANY, INCORPORATED, ROTH CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, and JEFFERIES LLC, Defendants. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER (1) SETTING TIME FOR FILING OF CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND (2) ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSIVE MOTION(S) MASTER FILE NO. : 2:14-CV-2571-MCE-KJN sf-3538812 1 Lead Plaintiffs Special Situations Fund III QP, L.P. and Special Situations Cayman 2 Fund, L.P. (“Lead Plaintiffs”) and Defendants Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. (“MBII” or “the 3 Company”), Pamela G. Marrone, James B. Boyd, Donald J. Glidewell, Hector Absi, Elin Miller, 4 Ranjeet Bhatia, Pamela Contag, Tim Fogarty, Lawrence Hough, Joseph Hudson, Les Lyman, 5 Richard Rominger, Shaugn Stanley, and Sean Schickedanz (collectively, “Defendants”), by and 6 through their respective counsel hereby recite and stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, 7 the following as concerns (1) the filing of a consolidated class action complaint (“Consolidated 8 Complaint”), and (2) the briefing schedule for any responsive motions. 9 RECITALS 10 WHEREAS Lead Plaintiffs filed a class action complaint on November 3, 2014 [Docket 11 No. 1], alleging that Defendants engaged in conduct that violates the federal securities laws, 12 specifically Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the 13 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; 14 15 WHEREAS the claims in this action are subject to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “PSLRA”); 16 WHEREAS counsel for Defendants accepted service of the initial complaint on 17 Defendants’ behalf, and the parties entered into a stipulation continuing the date by which 18 Defendants must answer or otherwise respond to the complaint until after the Court issued an 19 order pursuant to the PSLRA appointing lead plaintiff(s) and lead counsel [Docket No. 13]; 20 WHEREAS the parties further stipulated that counsel for Defendants would meet and 21 confer with the Court-appointed lead counsel within twenty (20) days following the Court’s 22 order appointing lead plaintiff(s) and lead counsel, to determine (i) whether the lead plaintiff(s) 23 will file a Consolidated Complaint, (ii) establish a common response date for all defendants, 24 including a briefing schedule on anticipated motions to dismiss, and (iii) establish a date by 25 which to provide the Court with a Joint Status Report; 26 WHEREAS by Order dated February 13, 2015 [Docket No. 18], this Court consolidated 27 the actions denominated as Martinelli v. Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc., No. 2:14-cv-2055- 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER (1) SETTING TIME FOR FILING OF CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND (2) ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSIVE MOTION(S) MASTER FILE NO. : 2:14-CV-2571-MCE-KJN sf-3538812 1 MCE-KJN, Sausman v. Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc., No. 2:14-cv-2072-MCE-KJN, Chen v. 2 Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc., 2:14-cv-2105-MCE-KJN, Oldham v. Marrone Bio Innovations, 3 Inc., 2:14-cv-2130-MCE-KJN, and Special Situations Fund III QP, L.P. v. Marrone Bio 4 Innovations, Inc., No. 2:14-cv-2571-MCE-KJN, designating No. 2:14-cv-2571 as the Master 5 File and administratively closing all of the other consolidated cases; 6 WHEREAS by that same Order, the Court appointed Special Situations Fund III QP, 7 L.P. and Special Situations Cayman Fund, L.P. as Lead Plaintiffs, and Lowenstein Sandler LLP 8 as Lead Counsel; 9 WHEREAS MBII has previously announced that the independent Audit Committee 10 investigation of certain revenue recognition issues is substantially completed, and that, in light 11 of the Audit Committee’s findings, MBII’s management is evaluating the necessity, nature and 12 scope of any restatements to any of MBII’s financial statements previously filed with the 13 Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) (the “Financial Statement Review”); 14 WHEREAS Lead Plaintiffs intend to file a Consolidated Complaint, and Defendants 15 have indicated that they intend to move to dismiss the Consolidated Complaint pursuant to Fed. 16 R. Civ. P. 12 and any other applicable law; 17 18 WHEREAS pursuant to the PSLRA, 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(b)(3)(B), all discovery in this consolidated class action is automatically stayed by operation of law; 19 WHEREAS by Order dated April 16, 2015 [Docket No. 27], this Court directed 20 Plaintiffs to file and serve the Consolidated Complaint no later than thirty (30) days after MBII 21 announces the results of the Financial Statement Review and, if MBII does not announce the 22 results of the Financial Statement Review by May 13, 2015, file and serve the Consolidated 23 Complaint no later than June 1, 2015; 24 WHEREAS on April 23, 2015, MBII announced that (i) its Audit Committee concluded, 25 after consultation with management, that certain financial statements should no longer be relied 26 upon, and (ii) although the Company expects to restate certain of its previously filed financial 27 statements, the Company’s evaluation process is ongoing and, accordingly, the Company cannot 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER (1) SETTING TIME FOR FILING OF CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND (2) ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSIVE MOTION(S) MASTER FILE NO. : 2:14-CV-2571-MCE-KJN sf-3538812 1 at this time provide an estimate of the timing, extent, or effect of such restatement (the 2 “Restatement(s)”); 3 4 WHEREAS the Restatement(s) may impact the allegations in the Consolidated Complaint; 5 WHEREAS although Lead Plaintiffs may properly file the Consolidated Complaint at 6 any time, undersigned counsel agree that the interests of justice would be best served by an 7 order directing Lead Plaintiffs to file the Consolidated Complaint after MBII announces the 8 results of the Restatement(s), so as to avoid the expense and delay that would be incurred by 9 further amending the Consolidated Complaint should the Restatement(s) be announced while 10 Defendants’ anticipated motion(s) to dismiss are being briefed. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 STIPULATION THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by Lead Plaintiffs and Defendants, through their respective counsel of record, as follows: 1. Lead Plaintiffs shall file and serve the Consolidated Complaint no later than sixty (60) days after MBII announces the Restatement(s). 2. Defendants shall file and serve any responsive pleading(s) or motion(s) to dismiss no later than sixty (60) days after the filing and service of the Consolidated Complaint. 3. If a motion to dismiss is filed, Lead Plaintiffs shall file and serve their opposition 20 brief(s) no later than forty-five (45) days after Defendants file and serve their motion(s) to 21 dismiss. 22 4. Defendants shall file and serve their reply(ies) in further support of the motion(s) 23 to dismiss no later than twenty-one (21) days after Lead Plaintiffs file and serve their opposition 24 brief(s). 25 5. In the event Defendants’ motion(s) to dismiss are denied in whole or in part, 26 Lead Plaintiffs and Defendants shall meet and confer within forty-five (45) days of the Court’s 27 disposition of Defendants’ motion(s) to dismiss to address the discovery-related topics set forth 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER (1) SETTING TIME FOR FILING OF CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND (2) ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSIVE MOTION(S) MASTER FILE NO. : 2:14-CV-2571-MCE-KJN sf-3538812 1 in the Court’s Order Requiring Joint Status Report and will thereafter submit to the Court a Rule 2 26(f) discovery plan consistent with that Order. 3 4 5 DATED: May 27, 2015 6 LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP By: 7 8 9 10 11 /s/ Michael J. McGaughey (As authorized on May 27, 2015) Michael J. McGaughey Lowenstein Sandler LLP 390 Lytton Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94301 Telephone: 415-288-4545 Fax: 415-288-4534 mmcgaughey@lowenstein.com Lawrence M. Rolnick (pro hac vice) Steven M. Hecht (pro hac vice) Thomas E. Redburn, Jr. (pro hac vice) Lowenstein Sandler LLP 1251 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10020 -and65 Livingston Avenue Roseland, NJ 07068 Telephone: 212-262-6700 Fax: 973-597-2400 lrolnick@lowenstein.com shecht@lowenstein.com tredburn@lowenstein.com 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs Special Situations Fund III QP, L.P. and Special Situations Cayman Fund, L.P. 21 22 23 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 24 By: 25 26 27 28 /s/Judson E. Lobdell Judson E. Lobdell JLobdell@mofo.com Jordan Eth JEth@mofo.com STIPULATION AND ORDER (1) SETTING TIME FOR FILING OF CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND (2) ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSIVE MOTION(S) MASTER FILE NO. : 2:14-CV-2571-MCE-KJN sf-3538812 Morrison & Foerster LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: 415-268-7000 Facsimile: 415-268-7522 1 2 3 4 Counsel for Defendants Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc., Pamela G. Marrone, James B. Boyd, Donald J. Glidewell, Elin Miller, Ranjeet Bhatia, Pamela Contag, Tim Fogarty, Lawrence Hough, Joseph Hudson, Les Lyman, Richard Rominger, Shaugn Stanley, and Sean Schickedanz 5 6 7 8 9 BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK LLP 10 11 By: 12 13 14 15 16 /s/ Jonathan C. Sandler (As authorized on May 27, 2015) Jonathan C. Sandler 2049 Century Park East, Suite 3550 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: 310-500-4600 Facsimile: 310-500-4602 Counsel for Defendant Hector Absi 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER (1) SETTING TIME FOR FILING OF CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND (2) ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSIVE MOTION(S) MASTER FILE NO. : 2:14-CV-2571-MCE-KJN sf-3538812 ORDER 1 2 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, it is hereby ordered that: 3 1. 4 5 6 7 Lead Plaintiffs shall file and serve the Consolidated Complaint no later than sixty (60) days after MBII announces the Restatement(s). 2. Defendants shall file and serve any responsive pleading(s) or motion(s) to dismiss no later than sixty (60) days after the filing and service of the Consolidated Complaint. 3. If a motion to dismiss is filed, Lead Plaintiffs shall file and serve their opposition 8 brief(s) no later than forty-five (45) days after Defendants file and serve their motion(s) to 9 dismiss. 10 4. Defendants shall file and serve their reply(ies) in further support of the motion(s) 11 to dismiss no later than twenty-one (21) days after Lead Plaintiffs file and serve their opposition 12 brief(s). 13 5. In the event Defendants’ motion(s) to dismiss are denied in whole or in part, 14 Lead Plaintiffs and Defendants shall meet and confer within forty-five (45) days of the Court’s 15 disposition of Defendants’ motion(s) to dismiss to address the discovery-related topics set forth 16 in the Court’s Order Requiring Joint Status Report and will thereafter submit to the Court a Rule 17 26(f) discovery plan consistent with that Order. 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 3, 2015 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER (1) SETTING TIME FOR FILING OF CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND (2) ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSIVE MOTION(S) MASTER FILE NO. : 2:14-CV-2571-MCE-KJN sf-3538812

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?